Message from @comrad foxy
Discord ID: 781550633969778698
But some of those ballots in the mix would be correctly dated.
Happy ThanksWINNING @Skittles !!! Good Morning!!!
I don't know if they would do that, they could only invalidate the ones that were properly segregated, which is like 10,000. But they CAN invalidate basically ALL of the mail-in ballots on the grounds that they were ALL unlawfull on the grounds that they weren't legally "observed".
way to go @DariusGalaxyz, you just advanced to level 3 <:magahat:772838503239122984>
The language in some of these states for not being observed even says the word unlawfull
Thank you happy Thanksgiving to you too @GamersForTrump
Me ?
They can invalidate ALL of them on the grounds that because there is no way now to tell which were possibly fraudulent and which were not
Once they are separated from their envelopes chain of custody is lost...
and because there is no way to tell which are which at that point, they could conceivable invalidate all of them
If I were arguing this case that's what I would argue
Hi
Hi!
And when people complain about disenfranchisement, they can complain to the demoncrats who tried to pull this ridiculous stunt
Hiya foxy!
I just think the safer reasoning the SCOTUS would be that that couldn't be observed, which by law makes them illegal.
You guys wanna hear a joke about our pedo-elect jo Biden
The other thing is more sketchy because some of them could indeed be legal, and you'd be throwing away good votes too.
Yeah sure.
way to go @Skittles, you just advanced to level 17 <:magahat:772838503239122984>
That both post the election.
They
That too
Lol
It would cause people to be upset but it's not sketchy...
My sloppy spelling there.
Lmao
The argument is a solid one and not easy to refute... I used to work for a civil litigation attorney and was going to be a lawyer before I changed career paths
How do you work now?
Foxy, jokes like that are not appropriate for this sever. please keep 'em clean. Thanks!
Yeah
I am a graphic designer
Well that's partly what I mean, it's more of a chance that good valid votes were thrown out. I'd rather do it for the reason that makes them legally unlawfull, lol.
Nice. I was thinking about being a judge but I don’t know how good my safety would be.
I would imagine that both arguments, plus some, will likely be used. The president has a very strong case in this
If I were the attorney handling this case I would use every argument I could... but I think the two above are a couple of the strongest ones
If they can also prove the stuff about Dominion then not only will we get our president back but it will likely trigger a complete overhaul of our system
We need that