https://twitter.com/blueslov/status/1325132410871193600?s=21

Regarding Kamala's citizenship, if her parents were here legally, on a Green Card say, the they were "subject to the jurisdiction thereof", and their offspring would be natural born.

On the other hand, if the Ambassador from New Guinea and his wife are here on diplomatic passports, they are NOT "subject to the jurisdiction thereof". They are still subjects of the New Guinea government, and even are exempt from our local laws and ordinances, like parking tickets and the like. So any children born to them while serving here, would NOT be conferred US citizenship.

Trump team denied lawsuit by michigan judge

😡😡

Yeah

That happened in PA as well

This is after they found a 6000 swing vote in one county

I’m trusting the plan but I can’t help but still be a little nervous.

Trump playing things by the book for now. He has plenty of evidence for sedition on a massive scale. I think things will change if it goes to the Supreme Court and the insurrectionists ignore it

Ignoring a Supreme Court order is a big deal

In PA yeah they have a real good case due to the dead ppl voting n the after election voting n nevada too

But the rest 🤷‍♂️ the constitution doesn't have an amendment fir software glitches

On the 9th I beleive the case for the SC to order a recount in all mentioned states is going on

The software is actually tampered with, Hammer and Scorecard, evidence building, Trump knows about it

Yeah I get that, but it'll take too long to fully investigate all that

They have until 8th of December

Trump will finish this before then, probably NOT with long counting and election chaos while the media and others continually pump the lie that biden won. Thats my take anyway

The sayings "Nothing can Stop what is coming" and "Its gonna be biblical" come to mind

> But the rest 🤷‍♂️ the constitution doesn't have an amendment fir software glitches
@CrazyLeo

SURE it does, the Equal Protection Clause of the XIV Amendment. All votes must be considered equally valid if validly cast.

BTW, there is no such thing as a "glitch" in software. There are only "bugs" and "features". Since all the changes made by the software were universally in one direction, we can safely assume that THIS "bug" is actually a "feature"!!

Yes, thats what I was saying curt, Hammer and Scorecard

OK I was just taking the advice of all the lawyers stating what I have just said. But they must be wrong too, republican lawyers too btw
The software stuff is known as a retail case not a wholesale case, its less achievable n won't hold up in the supreme court

Also it will take too long to investigate for its not just certain states, itll be fir all states, the d's will block the shit outta this

So let's hope its sorted by then for if it goes to the supreme Court only PA n nevada are his chance n the rest it quite literally fucked

Unless more of the same appears in the other states

Actually the SC is supposed to order a recount of ALL the states in question, but I don't believe that will be Trump's killing stroke or how he will win

Yes but that's supposed to be way before it goes to a legal case in the court

All of this is a coup and they repeatingly break the law and ignore even a Supreme Court judge

So if the Supreme Court itself entirely rules in Trump's favor, and they ignore it...

Lol the supreme Court ain't gonna matter if this doesn't get sorted before it gets to a case there, currently the d's are claiming the presidency, they still hold the house, they could tie the senate, then it's at their disposal to disobey everything. Which as you know they are very good at and nothing ever happens

So pray he gets this sorted n a proper recount is ordered n it all works out

If not fear the worst if this goes to the supreme Court for review

As I've said I believe this ends with the QEmergency broadcast system and blackout of all other signals, along with mass arrests under the Insurrection and Sedition Acts. To save the Republic and stop the Great Reset.

Let's hope so

Yeah

@CrazyLeo there is actually a quite transparent case regarding the PA Vote By Mail Law. The Supreme Court heard the initial pleadings, denied the secondary appeal for expedited review, but did not rule on the primary.

The basis of the case is that the legislative statute defined the rules for mail-in voting. The law has a severability clause that states that if any clause is changed, other than by Legislative amendment, the whole law is void. The Governor arbitrarily changed the rules, contrary to the law, even though the Legislature was IN SESSION!

So Scotus could easily to either, 1) invalidate the Governor's rule changes, 2) invalidate the entire law, tossing out ALL mail-in ballots, or 3) allow the direct violation the legislative intent, and the direct meaning of the election laws in the US Constitution.

My best guess is that I presented them in order of likelihood, since 3 Justices have already questioned the Governor's authority to violate the PA law by unilaterally amending it without the authority being granted.

They will probably be presented with all the evidence collected of the fraud as well, which will determine the decision further no?

Can you stop with the capital letters, what are you 5 or something??
Clearly you have issues reading what I typed too regarding Pennsylvania

easy

curt's explanation was very good. Its just his writing style nothing wrong with caps Leo

curt do you think when all the evidence is presented from Rudy and others of the various fraud methods discovered, the Supreme Court may rule more on the lines of 2?

Yeah but pa was never in question