Not everything has to propose a solution to other issues. The more unfocused a solution becomes on one problem the less effective it is

why pull out of the geneva convention? do we *want* to commit war crimes?

There are some things within the convention that dont make any sense. Along with the Hague Convention

Like banning hollow points in warfare.

Every *citizen* 18 and over has the right to vote. Giving a minor the right to vote is the same as allowing that child to set it's own boundaries and limits. They will base each decision on their own very small view of the world and with a total lack of experience. They are incapable of making an informed decision. That creates an argument for increasing the age, not lowering it. Far more important is verifying who the voter is, If they are a citizen and have the right to vote and preventing fraud. Anyone opposed to preventing fraud and identification is most likely someone that needs voter fraud to win an election. The argument that requiring ID is somehow preventing anyone from voting is utterly false. We all need ID in todays world to do almost anything. Travel, medical care, using a credit card, other banking, too many to count. Not having an ID isolates you from active society and could get you arrested.

i dont believe lack of ID leads to arrests nowadays. detainment yes until they can verify who you are

Getting put in cuffs and dragged off is close enough for me.

then youre not basing it off a definition of anything just how you feel it is. You will be detained if you are a suspect and dont have identification. Thats just standard procedure, not to mention if theyre detaining you to figure out who you are they had reasonable suspicion to detain you for an investigation already.

So it seems youve left a factual argument for an emotional one at that point

Wasn't the reason for banning hollow points because the crowning effect did more damage then the even in and out of a non-hollow point?

those that violate the geneva convention only get punished when they lose the war

https://tenor.com/view/nothing-speechless-castle-nathan-fillion-gif-7222166

@Wyrm and why exactly is that bad when talking about eliminating the enemy and prevent collateral?

I moved to VA and never thought about a militia. Guess I have something to research huh

@✌🐧Ⓡａᑎ𝐚 🐿🎯 About the stay at home mom thing: I thought the head of the house sits down and discusses things before casting a vote. Maybe things changed... Idk..

wait you actually think that only one person votes for the household?

anybody of legal age to vote regardless of how many in a household votes

I'm a teen and I think that voting age should be raised

my people are commies

also is the usa actually considering pulling out of the geneva convention?

I don't think so

where did you here that?

Gun laws = Gun control?

gun laws = right to bear arms infringement

Alright, see because that can also mean laws that allow guns

sick thought - remove all gun laws from the books, when u arrest a criminal that has a gun, the criminal gets to keep the gun, but not the bullets

Gun laws, *all of them* are unconstitutional. I should be able to own any gun that I would like, just because I **can**, and I don't need some bureaucratic asshole telling me otherwise.

Making it illegal for felons to own guns seems like a viable gun law. Rights are tied to responsibilities after all.

Non violent felons should always have a way to earn them back

other than pedos and whatnot

well those that didn't use a gun to commit a crime or defend themselves from a warranted arrest, then yes

Is this place where all the Pokémon went?

***YES***

and u missed the epic deathmatch between them

@[TDE] Smokie Change the poll question to who WOULD you vote for... some of us can't vote y'know.

😐

Don't @ me for that. Come on man.

Where my fellow not-in-america-but-would-vote-for-trump squad?

*cricket noises*

Forgot about that message

Go figure