Message from @john23

Discord ID: 784423795326844928


2020-12-04 13:17:49 UTC  

Which is good

2020-12-04 13:20:56 UTC  

If a state flips to Trump, Sleepy Joe might just concede because it's a domino effect

2020-12-04 13:21:06 UTC  

How will they rule on the cases, exactly?

2020-12-04 13:21:30 UTC  

Just like Alito trying to order PA to do whatever he ordered.

2020-12-04 13:21:44 UTC  

Like the ballot segregation for example he asked.

2020-12-04 13:21:56 UTC  

We all know PA didn't do it and Alito doesn't like it.

2020-12-04 13:23:25 UTC  

We just need one state to tip the others

2020-12-04 13:24:05 UTC  

Can Alito invalidate PA?

2020-12-04 13:27:19 UTC  

He can

2020-12-04 13:27:39 UTC  

He's the SCOTUS Judge

2020-12-04 13:33:25 UTC  

I doubt he would concede

2020-12-04 13:33:30 UTC  

Maybe, but I doubt it

2020-12-04 13:33:53 UTC  

He knows how corrupt the states are, pretty much everyone in power is fighting for him

2020-12-04 13:34:23 UTC  

He oversees PA’s circuit courts

2020-12-04 13:35:55 UTC  

Yes

2020-12-04 13:36:18 UTC  

@PatriotMan He said he won't concede to fraud and Dominion

2020-12-04 13:52:52 UTC  

yeah why would he

2020-12-04 14:10:34 UTC  

💀

2020-12-04 14:11:06 UTC  

Is this one of the counties that exceed 100% voter turnout?

2020-12-04 14:17:37 UTC  
2020-12-04 14:20:06 UTC  

Thank God the deep state forgot to delete security footage!

2020-12-04 14:23:12 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/730962163098976346/784424574237671484/image0.png

2020-12-04 14:23:32 UTC  

I’m going to contact congressman, big tech needs to be put in check. https://www.inhofe.senate.gov/contact

2020-12-04 15:43:24 UTC  

Combined with this, that's very interesting. Maybe Biden will concede Saturday morning

2020-12-04 15:46:25 UTC  

Biden will concede nothing. the guy doenst even know where he is

2020-12-04 15:51:31 UTC  

REMOVING Section 230 completely is a BAD idea. It would have the most devastating effects on Content Creators. Updating the Section 230 to not provide protection to "groups" that claim to be Platforms but act as Publishers would be the far better way to go.

2020-12-04 15:51:51 UTC  

they keep him in his basement playing with his dog so nothing happens to him.... hold on...

2020-12-04 15:53:25 UTC  

Section 230 needs to be overhauled or, SCOTUS could hand down rulings that remove 230 protection in specific conditions.

2020-12-04 15:57:55 UTC  

Victory rally?

2020-12-04 15:58:19 UTC  

Biden won't concede. He will hold onto it until the bitter end when he is forced to do it

2020-12-04 15:58:36 UTC  

Oh please

2020-12-04 15:58:46 UTC  

Biden doesn’t even know he’s running for president

2020-12-04 15:59:44 UTC  

Biden: « i’LL bE dEaD wHeN i ConcEdE » 15 days later:...

2020-12-04 16:01:35 UTC  

Section 230 is another good in theory Bill just like socialism and communism are good in theory until dictators like Stalin get ahold of it. Replace Stalin w Twitter, Facebook, YouTube etc

2020-12-04 16:05:31 UTC  

The intent behind 230 was to provide Platforms with the abilty to allow free speech without being sued for it. It's purpose has been twisted into allowing the Platforms to censor Publishers that they don't agree with, for whatever reason. This is an abuse of 230.

2020-12-04 16:06:19 UTC  

Section 230 protects the big content hosters and the small guys who host a phpBB forum.

Maybe Youtube’s aim is to remove Section 230, because they’ll always have enough lawyers to find other solutions/negotiate/prop up CNN content instead.

Meanwhile small forums and the likes of unprofitable Yahoo Answers will disappear.

2020-12-04 16:08:27 UTC  

Trump is a buisnessman, he barters

2020-12-04 16:08:29 UTC  

you aim high

2020-12-04 16:08:30 UTC  

Aslo, @john23, I have to agree with Ben Shapiro here and say that socialism/communism was NEVER a good idea in any context. Both allow for the theft of Peoples hard work and innovation via the noble sentiment of "for the people".