Message from @sticktek
Discord ID: 784444756406960158
Like the ballot segregation for example he asked.
We all know PA didn't do it and Alito doesn't like it.
We just need one state to tip the others
Can Alito invalidate PA?
He can
He's the SCOTUS Judge
I doubt he would concede
Maybe, but I doubt it
He knows how corrupt the states are, pretty much everyone in power is fighting for him
He oversees PA’s circuit courts
Yes
@PatriotMan He said he won't concede to fraud and Dominion
yeah why would he
💀
Is this one of the counties that exceed 100% voter turnout?
Georgia Governor Urges Secretary of State to Order Signature Audit Over Unusual Fulton County Video
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/georgia-governor-urges-secretary-of-state-to-order-signature-audit-over-unusual-fulton-county-video_3604589.html
Thank God the deep state forgot to delete security footage!
I’m going to contact congressman, big tech needs to be put in check. https://www.inhofe.senate.gov/contact
Biden will concede nothing. the guy doenst even know where he is
REMOVING Section 230 completely is a BAD idea. It would have the most devastating effects on Content Creators. Updating the Section 230 to not provide protection to "groups" that claim to be Platforms but act as Publishers would be the far better way to go.
they keep him in his basement playing with his dog so nothing happens to him.... hold on...
Section 230 needs to be overhauled or, SCOTUS could hand down rulings that remove 230 protection in specific conditions.
Victory rally?
Biden won't concede. He will hold onto it until the bitter end when he is forced to do it
Oh please
Biden doesn’t even know he’s running for president
Biden: « i’LL bE dEaD wHeN i ConcEdE » 15 days later:...
Section 230 is another good in theory Bill just like socialism and communism are good in theory until dictators like Stalin get ahold of it. Replace Stalin w Twitter, Facebook, YouTube etc
The intent behind 230 was to provide Platforms with the abilty to allow free speech without being sued for it. It's purpose has been twisted into allowing the Platforms to censor Publishers that they don't agree with, for whatever reason. This is an abuse of 230.
Section 230 protects the big content hosters and the small guys who host a phpBB forum.
Maybe Youtube’s aim is to remove Section 230, because they’ll always have enough lawyers to find other solutions/negotiate/prop up CNN content instead.
Meanwhile small forums and the likes of unprofitable Yahoo Answers will disappear.
Trump is a buisnessman, he barters
you aim high
Aslo, @john23, I have to agree with Ben Shapiro here and say that socialism/communism was NEVER a good idea in any context. Both allow for the theft of Peoples hard work and innovation via the noble sentiment of "for the people".
then settle with what you really want
'remove section 230'
'ahh, alright you win, we'll just remove the bits which give twitter and facebook power'