Message from @Tsarena
Discord ID: 784450323703136306
yeah why would he
💀
Is this one of the counties that exceed 100% voter turnout?
Georgia Governor Urges Secretary of State to Order Signature Audit Over Unusual Fulton County Video
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/georgia-governor-urges-secretary-of-state-to-order-signature-audit-over-unusual-fulton-county-video_3604589.html
Thank God the deep state forgot to delete security footage!
I’m going to contact congressman, big tech needs to be put in check. https://www.inhofe.senate.gov/contact
Combined with this, that's very interesting. Maybe Biden will concede Saturday morning
Biden will concede nothing. the guy doenst even know where he is
REMOVING Section 230 completely is a BAD idea. It would have the most devastating effects on Content Creators. Updating the Section 230 to not provide protection to "groups" that claim to be Platforms but act as Publishers would be the far better way to go.
they keep him in his basement playing with his dog so nothing happens to him.... hold on...
Section 230 needs to be overhauled or, SCOTUS could hand down rulings that remove 230 protection in specific conditions.
Victory rally?
Biden won't concede. He will hold onto it until the bitter end when he is forced to do it
Oh please
Biden doesn’t even know he’s running for president
Biden: « i’LL bE dEaD wHeN i ConcEdE » 15 days later:...
Section 230 is another good in theory Bill just like socialism and communism are good in theory until dictators like Stalin get ahold of it. Replace Stalin w Twitter, Facebook, YouTube etc
The intent behind 230 was to provide Platforms with the abilty to allow free speech without being sued for it. It's purpose has been twisted into allowing the Platforms to censor Publishers that they don't agree with, for whatever reason. This is an abuse of 230.
Section 230 protects the big content hosters and the small guys who host a phpBB forum.
Maybe Youtube’s aim is to remove Section 230, because they’ll always have enough lawyers to find other solutions/negotiate/prop up CNN content instead.
Meanwhile small forums and the likes of unprofitable Yahoo Answers will disappear.
Trump is a buisnessman, he barters
you aim high
Aslo, @john23, I have to agree with Ben Shapiro here and say that socialism/communism was NEVER a good idea in any context. Both allow for the theft of Peoples hard work and innovation via the noble sentiment of "for the people".
then settle with what you really want
'remove section 230'
'ahh, alright you win, we'll just remove the bits which give twitter and facebook power'
As pointed out to the left countless times, what works in your favor THIS time, may work against you the next time. An example of this is when Pres. Trump nominated ACB to the SCOTUS and she was confirmed by the Senate. Dems had done this very same thing in the past and in fact, the "rule" they went by had been dubbed "the Biden rule" because former VP Biden had introduced it into the Senate years ago.
Is there anything we can do to make sure legislators will repeal section 230?
No, you want a judge to rule that Twitter isn’t protected by Section 230, not get rid of 230.
Youtube and Twitter are editors, period. Any other forum that doesn’t select posts must stay protected by Section 230.
that sounds a much better idea than remove it entirely
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlFgLaie/clown-show-georgia-election-insi/c/
What a clown world we live in.
“It’s normal to pull suitcases underneath a table filled with biased ballots”
And people said my idea of showing video footage is bad
It blows people's mind
Ffs
so what are the odds we're taking back georgia?