Message from @Tsarena
Discord ID: 784452190432919552
Biden will concede nothing. the guy doenst even know where he is
REMOVING Section 230 completely is a BAD idea. It would have the most devastating effects on Content Creators. Updating the Section 230 to not provide protection to "groups" that claim to be Platforms but act as Publishers would be the far better way to go.
they keep him in his basement playing with his dog so nothing happens to him.... hold on...
Section 230 needs to be overhauled or, SCOTUS could hand down rulings that remove 230 protection in specific conditions.
Victory rally?
Biden won't concede. He will hold onto it until the bitter end when he is forced to do it
Oh please
Biden doesn’t even know he’s running for president
Biden: « i’LL bE dEaD wHeN i ConcEdE » 15 days later:...
Section 230 is another good in theory Bill just like socialism and communism are good in theory until dictators like Stalin get ahold of it. Replace Stalin w Twitter, Facebook, YouTube etc
The intent behind 230 was to provide Platforms with the abilty to allow free speech without being sued for it. It's purpose has been twisted into allowing the Platforms to censor Publishers that they don't agree with, for whatever reason. This is an abuse of 230.
Section 230 protects the big content hosters and the small guys who host a phpBB forum.
Maybe Youtube’s aim is to remove Section 230, because they’ll always have enough lawyers to find other solutions/negotiate/prop up CNN content instead.
Meanwhile small forums and the likes of unprofitable Yahoo Answers will disappear.
Trump is a buisnessman, he barters
you aim high
Aslo, @john23, I have to agree with Ben Shapiro here and say that socialism/communism was NEVER a good idea in any context. Both allow for the theft of Peoples hard work and innovation via the noble sentiment of "for the people".
then settle with what you really want
'remove section 230'
'ahh, alright you win, we'll just remove the bits which give twitter and facebook power'
As pointed out to the left countless times, what works in your favor THIS time, may work against you the next time. An example of this is when Pres. Trump nominated ACB to the SCOTUS and she was confirmed by the Senate. Dems had done this very same thing in the past and in fact, the "rule" they went by had been dubbed "the Biden rule" because former VP Biden had introduced it into the Senate years ago.
Is there anything we can do to make sure legislators will repeal section 230?
No, you want a judge to rule that Twitter isn’t protected by Section 230, not get rid of 230.
Youtube and Twitter are editors, period. Any other forum that doesn’t select posts must stay protected by Section 230.
that sounds a much better idea than remove it entirely
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlFgLaie/clown-show-georgia-election-insi/c/
What a clown world we live in.
“It’s normal to pull suitcases underneath a table filled with biased ballots”
And people said my idea of showing video footage is bad
It blows people's mind
Ffs
so what are the odds we're taking back georgia?
hows the other states doing
Twitter not being under 230: There must be shenanigans, otherwise it would already have been done. Maybe all those Republicans like Ted Cruz, are hinting the population like us that someone should start lodging a lawsuit (e.g. for Sandman the highschool guy), and only then can the lawsuit bubble up to SCOTUS to judge whether Twitter can hide itself behind Section 230, to which Ted Cruz will be favorable.
But it _must_ start with a citizen’s lawsuit and bubble up. They can’t trial it without an actual case. All those congress hearings of Twitter CEO are not lawsuits. Senators are just extremely favorable that Twitter is an editor, but can’t do much without a lawsuit.
Yeah I wondered why more don't do what Candace Owens did regarding FB
Yes similar to how Verizon cannot be sued for something said by a Verizon customer. However, imagine if Verizon was able to jump into your telephone calls or fact check your texts...that’s abuse of power. If Twitter wants to be neutral that’s one thing but they are not and abusing section 230. I agree socialism and communism will never work here, only in heaven 🙂
Just remove the 230 protections from Twitter etc as they have shown themselves to be a publisher, picking and choosing what gets allowed on the platform.
My only concern regarding 230 is in terms of like ISPs
Like an ISP should absolutely be immune to things sent over the wire per se, but I could care less about the actual website
but if they were not, then would they sniff all traffic?
and also be liable for like well just anything we do per se