Well, theoretically yes. And the case doesn't argue that they can't. However, state's must follow their own laws that are on the books and only those with the power granted to them may change the election rules. In many of these states, it wasn't the state legislature changing their state law for election rules.

Ok - that is a really good point.

Bc it wasn’t the legislature changing the rules of the election. That has to be shown as unconstitutional

I hope the people who have standing for that are the ones bringing it forward.

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/PROJECTS/FTRIALS/conlaw/righttovote.html
Here is something that discusses legal precedent concerning the Equal Voter Protection Clause.

also Georgia's executive branch created laws at the last second, which ***only the legislatures have the sole authority to write new laws***

https://twitter.com/CalebJHull/status/1336879245453385729

Yes- and I hope that the people that have standing for bringing the suit are the ones doing so. Texas doesn’t have standing. But the GA legislators do, given that it’s in their own state.

This definitely means that we need Voter ID and hand count ballots **across the board**

She sounds like a megachurch scammer.

That woman is a drunken embarrassment to humanity.

based pic related.

And then kamala Harris’ statement about it. Funny how she didn’t have that same standard when it came to jussie smollett.

she's trying to play the race and faith card

Actually, Texas does have standing, as do the 20 or so states that are suing. The Equal Voter Protection Clause is a U.S. Federal Law. It is within each state's rights to ensure that their constituents are counted for in any election. If it is believed that there is fraudulent voting in Ohio and it would change the outcome of an election, then it is the duty of the state to protect the election for their constituents.

"based pic related" ,,few yrs of political correctness will do that to a ppl sick and tired of bs politicians on every side of the vote

and when i mean 'a ppl' ...i mean american ppl in general

trump was the thunderdome warrior waiting to get into the game...but the thunderdome had to be built first

The electors meet soon do you think trump can turn the results by then?

He still can

The cases keep getting rejected

Not really all of them

Also fun fact about Bush v Gore: Bush's cases always got rejected in lower courts.

So Trump is not alone

How can he bring it to the Supreme Court

Texas's case

It's the docketing

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163237/20201209155924009_2020-12-9%20Texas%20Scotus%20Amici%20Brief-%20FINAL.pdf

PA response to TX filing

1. They're Republicans, you can't trust them
2. You gave us very little time to respond!

LMAOOOO

"We broke the constitution and the law, so what?"

- PA

"SCOTUS cannot try election disputes."

Bush v Gore: Am I a joke to you?

"In the rare instance that a state supreme court’s ruling violates a federal constitutional provision or statute, this Court has appellate jurisdiction."

Imagine being given days to make a good counter argument to the republicans and only coming up with "plz don't"

Just read it, their actual reply is that they are trying to make a mockery of the court, and that the court doesn't have the power to decide the winner of the presidential election. Both are not true statements

SCOTUS better take on the case and not drop it. The fate of the free world literally depends on it

It’s pathetic

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

updated