np np

The verse when you write out the entire thing says Christ essentially showed God to people

people see God through Christ, thus

which is cohesive with Christology

Older forms of Christianity (eastern) hold that if you see God, you die

essentially, this is because God is a pure unyielding source of energy which rips apart our entire psyche upon interaction

In that verse in Genesis, God reveals himself to Abraham as a man

much like God walked with Adam and Eve in the garden

this is because it was always Christ

either way, if you go into the Lovecraftian approaches, an infinite all powerful being logically *should* rip apart your sanity and the very matter you exist of if you should approach it

unless such a being retracts itself

(Christ)

-Christ is essentially a retraction of the Father so that the Father interacts with humanity indirectly but presently

I know I know, I just love referencing him when speaking about incomprehensibly alien beings

alien in the sense of strange to our existence

Also on this verse

*“…The LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron.” — Judges 1:19*

Isn't it saying that *judah* couldn't drive out the chariot soldiers?

not God?

Because I think the author of the book would be pretty strange if he was trying to make religious propaganda and his own propaganda called his god weak

and lastly *circumcision*

always a fun way to start your friday morning

discussing esoteric biblican circumcision habits 😂

Well this actually is an argument that has to be raised for a LOT of points in the bible from new testament to old

you see when the jews went off into Israel they had a set of rules to follow until the Messiah came

those rules can be called the laws of Leviticus or the law of Moses

Christ had this to say about these:

***“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.***

Christ actually spoke against what was considered to be traditional at the time

for example he told people not to excecute women for shagging men outside of their marriage

-which is punishable by death in the old testament

This brings me back to my gripe with context

you can't say that Christians should all kill gays because the bible says so 🙂

that was a law for a time that was specifically implemented to ensure the survival of the early Church (Israel and Judah)

so in terms of circumcision, these were for jews who upheld a specific string of laws and the circumcision was a brandmark that bore witness to these

after the laws were fulfilled, the circumcision was no longer needed

The New Testament goes through a good deal of effort trying to explain this in the later books which people like to forget because they aren't as exciting

@ThyDoctor That's me for now

the long and the short of this is ultimately that there is a explanation for everything

the reasons I am, for example, not a Muslim is because I find that there are *moral* issues in Islam

religion isn't science, it's a different field