and Congress should have it's own, of course, call it: losers -- Legislative Online Summaries and Emergency Reporting System

yea i would ask and trust what the Girl said not them.... Virginia Giuffre i think it was. once again Propaganda for all else involved

In other words, no evidentiary hearing was granted.

The case was not reviewed on merits

Biden is a odd hugger close talker

@ShittyKitty she said mar a lago was a recruiting ground for esptien

sO SINCE NOBODY WANTS TO LISTEN TO ME i WILL PRINT IN CAPS..... THERE...!!!

1997 - WAS 8 YEARS AFTER USSR FELL APART. YELTZIN WAS DRINKING TOO MUCH, AND DECIDED THAT, WELL UKRAINE, LEAVE THEM ALONE BASTARDS...

1998 - PUTIN CAME TO POWER, AND SAID "WHAT!!! NO!!! HOW ARE WE GONNA SELLL SHIT THAT WE STOLE FROM SIBERIA AND ELSEWHERE (IN OIL) TO EUROPE!!! NO111 WE NEED TO OWN UKRAINE (AND IT WOULD BE NICE IF IT ANNEXED ALL TOGETHER SO THAT WE DONT HAVE TO BOTHER ABOUT BUYING YET ANOTHER PRIME MINISTER OR SOMETHING)

SO THEN....
THEY HAD DEEP CRUEL POLITICAL AND KILLING AND BRIBING CAMPAIGN TO DO SO...

SHORT VERSION

2014, UKRAINE GOT FED UP WITH THEM AND SAID SCREW YOU WE CONTROL OUR MONEY

BIDEN CAME IN AND PROFITED FROM THE "CRISIS" 2014-17

THEN ALSO, PUTIN HAD HIS WAHT 20TH TERM IN OFFICE, AND NEEDED TO SHOW SOMETHING FOR THAT, SO HE SAID,

WE WILL TAKE CRIMEA , AND GUESS WHAT, IT IS OURS TO BEGIN WITH
AND HE WAS RIGHT..... right right right, IT WAS CHRUCHEV WHO WAS AN IDIOT AND IN LIKE 1970 AS A TRADE FOR A PACK OF CORN SAID, SURE CRIMEA CAN BE UNDER UKRAINE!.... WHO CARES!!! USSR NEVER FALLING APART (OR IF IT IS I CAN WAIVE MY WAY OUT OF IT ((LOOK UP CHRUCHEV AND BREZNEVS WAVES, THEY ARE PART OF HISTORY)))

ANYHOW, TO SHOW RUSSIA PUTIN IS WORTH HIS SALT HE TOOK CRIMEA
BUT, IN THE PROCESS KILLED A LOT OF UKRANIAN AND RUSSIAN SOLDIERS AND CIVILIANS

JUST ONE MORE POINT, TECHNICALLY ITS TRUE THAT ITS VERY HARD TO TELL WHERE "TRUE" BORDER OF RUSSIA AND CRIMEA LIES -- MOST PEOPLE IN EAST UKRAINE ARE ACTUALLY RUASSIAN....

WHICH IS WHY THIS FIGHTING BETWEEN THEM IS SO SO SO SO SO STUPID


NOW, HERE'S HOW IT RELATES TO US (ALSO VERY SHORTNEDED VERSION)

RUSSIANS AND PUTIN HATE OBAMA HATE HILLARY, AND THEY COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND HOW CORRUPT AND SENILE BIDEN IS....

WHEN TRUMP WAS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT, HE TOLD PUTIN THAT HE WASNT TO BE MAYBE NOT FRIENDS, BUT CIVIL. TRUMP DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE CONSEQUENCES OF WHAT HE SAID PERHAPS, AND DID NOT REALIZE HOW IMPORTANT IT WAS TO STAND UP TO DEMS WHEN THEY PUSHED THE RUSSIAN SANCTIONS. INSTEAD HE TRIED TO PLEASE. AND EVEN THOUGH HE DID GO TO TRADE WAS WITH CHINA, WITH RUSSIA HE JUST SMUDGED THEM.... MUFFLED AND BROUGHT TO NEAR BANCRUPCY THROUGH SANCTIONS, LACK OF ECONOMIC COOPERATION, BLOCKING THE PIPE, AND LACK OF COOPERATION WITH OTHER COUNTRIES....

SO, THIS ELECTION, RUSSIA HACKED AGAINST TRUMP, BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT BIDEN, IS TO BE BOUGHT THROUGH AND THROUGH, AND THEY ARE FAKING COOPERATION WITH CHINA AND IRAN FOR AS LONG AS ITS NEEDED.....


SO THERE FOLKS....


NOW SCREAM AT ME FOR TYPING IN CAPS

*screams*

The PA Boockvar case went all the way to the US SC where they allowed the PA SC decision to stand after a 4-4 decision where Roberts sided with the "liberal" judges.

The did not hear the Act 77 case, because they would not have granted the relief sought. If you look at the ruling in the SC case - - where state officials relaxed the requirement to require witness signatures for mail-in ballots - determined that state officials did not have a justification for relaxing that requirement because it didn't subject voters to a significant health risk to get the witness signatures (it's not like they would have to stand in line like voting in person, for example). So, the SC ruled that they needed to reinstate the witness signature requirement. However, they recognized that people who had already voted had done so in good faith and ordered that any ballots received without witness signatures that were postmarked within three days of their order would be counted.

So, even if the SC ruled that a particular law was unconstitutional, they already set the precedent that votes cast in good faith - even if technically improper - would be counted. You were never going to see ANY votes cast in good faith get thrown out. It was always going to require that fraud be proven in order for the election results to be questioned - and enough fraud to make a difference in the outcome, because there is no way to know how anyone voted due to ballot secrecy.

my ears ... oh, I mean my eyes

I don't think Trumpism will die with Trump. I see many defecting the republican party and either going independent, libertarian or forming their own party.
After this shit show I think many people will be quitting the republican party as it is full of backstabbing traitors.
Trump is just a man, you don't need the man you need the idea for a movement.

Good God... Straight up f****** retards.

Ok ok, can we all just pause, take a breath, and realize a Viking was in the Speakers chair yesterday.

Seriously though, why is he dressed like that?

@leftingfighter33 he will be replaced by Trump jr

Or ivanka

🤢🤮

you have any proof does the FBI know why has nothing been done about this????

I can actually see Trump supporters forming their own party and destroying the GOP. The GOP will have to beg to be let in.

Conspiracy theories are only allowed to circulate on the Left.

I love the content... For future reference, we'd still read it without all caps... And please don't wait for an invitation. All perspectives and viewpoints are welcome.

It’s an incomplete court. ACB would have made it 5-4. Also, where is the full opinion? All I saw was who agreed with giving relief and who didn’t

Trump is the man without ideas ... he is a man of style NOT substance

I CANT SEE WITH NO CAPS MAN... BLIND... ok and sorry

It doesn't matter... a ruling is a ruling.

trump has many ideas

It was a stalemate.

@AOH_Assassin If Roberts wanted to overturn it, he would have.

No???

Never mind that was from the 5th

ACB wasn’t on the court, remember that. The disagreement didn’t weigh more than the agreement. A 4-4 ruling did not decide anything

The whitehouse did not blame antifa for the riot

And Russians also hate Biden, to some extent, and they dont think Kamela is a person (more like 3/5th) of a person... so would be interesting if she is president

And to add to that, Russians hate American/US leaders, they dont hate American people

And that wasn’t a hearing on any fraud btw

we have vids of biden being a pedo, georgia election being stolen on camera, doesn't seem to mean anything to these fckn crooks. it's sickening.

Are you 12