Message from @Ghostdog

Discord ID: 796984407478239242


2021-01-08 06:02:45 UTC  

Sure... Whatever that means. They didn't publish their methodology, so we can't say for certain.

2021-01-08 06:03:09 UTC  

I could care less about crack pot sidney. I wanted the legislature to look at the ballots, irrespective of the machines. Hand forensic audit, not a percentage recount using tabulators. That would have placated the right.

2021-01-08 06:03:50 UTC  

They did a hand recount of Antrim

2021-01-08 06:04:12 UTC  

I'm not sure what a hand forensic audit is, but I know that they did a hand recount in Antrim County and found that the totals were spot on.

2021-01-08 06:04:17 UTC  

More or less

2021-01-08 06:04:29 UTC  

Yes, that is not a complete forensic audit.

2021-01-08 06:05:33 UTC  

What is a complete forensic audit? Because it is a made up term with regards to elections. It is a term usually used for financial audits.

2021-01-08 06:06:33 UTC  

Nothing was going to “placate the right” they were making up tests 😂

2021-01-08 06:06:43 UTC  

it sounds good lol

2021-01-08 06:07:40 UTC  

kinda like a Covid test as when starting you have no idea what you are looking for?

2021-01-08 06:07:48 UTC  

It has that CSI feel... I can hear the Who in the background now.

2021-01-08 06:08:15 UTC  

Fingerprint and blood tests on every ballot

2021-01-08 06:08:55 UTC  

dna sample of you 1st born yea that could work...

2021-01-08 06:09:11 UTC  

Why stop there? Full DNA analysis... Spectrometer to test all foreign substances...

2021-01-08 06:09:42 UTC  

Quite simply, you test the paper, the ink, the printing on the paper, the lay out of the printing on the paper, the signatures on the ballots, and the signatures in the register.

2021-01-08 06:10:00 UTC  

i think it means keep looking until you find fraud, and if u dont find fraud its not complete.. that pulitzer guy wants to examine folds in the ballots and take ink samples, yes call CSI lol

2021-01-08 06:10:17 UTC  

There’s no signatures on ballots they are anonymous by law

2021-01-08 06:10:40 UTC  

Envelopes rather.

2021-01-08 06:10:59 UTC  

I’m not sure why “testing paper” was brought up that’s silly nonsense.

2021-01-08 06:11:29 UTC  

i had to sign for absentee ballot, but never when voting at a polling place

2021-01-08 06:11:37 UTC  

I'm sorry... that's rather ridiculous. You would have to have probable cause for anything like that. Not to mention that Trump WON Antrim county by 4,000 votes. If anyone was cheating, it would have been Trump.

2021-01-08 06:11:53 UTC  

Because people are accusing the counties of extra printing and China possibly printing ballots.

2021-01-08 06:11:53 UTC  

@LairdZach, you just advanced to level 10!

2021-01-08 06:11:59 UTC  

that would be Goldfish voter suppression. Pift

2021-01-08 06:12:33 UTC  

And if the ballots say made in China they wouldn’t work?

2021-01-08 06:13:03 UTC  

i heard that too but honestly why would democrats need Chinese to print up ballots, kinda far fetched if not backed up with hard evidence

2021-01-08 06:13:08 UTC  

Loads of people feel their was. Personally, I'm not one of them.

2021-01-08 06:13:34 UTC  

If you stopped for a second and thought about it... Imagine Clinton making similar assertions in 2016. People on the right were apoplectic about her campaign suing for recounts.

2021-01-08 06:14:15 UTC  

you could get a dna sample of the paper and track that it was not stolen from the rainforrest. Tree Lives Matter umm sorry too soon?

2021-01-08 06:14:17 UTC  

That was funny you can’t get a recount Hillary you lost. Let alone a lawsuit or any kind of testing

2021-01-08 06:14:28 UTC  

Maybe she should have. She conceded immediately.

2021-01-08 06:14:37 UTC  

im sure there was a ton of fraud in 2016 too, just not enuf.. thats why they never push hard on it.. they supposedly stole the nomination from Bernie too

2021-01-08 06:15:01 UTC  

LMAO when we couldnt do the simple recount nice LMAO

2021-01-08 06:15:38 UTC  

please stop you are making my sides hurt

2021-01-08 06:15:44 UTC  

True... There would be paper trails that should be easily investigated. Someone with a pile of cash for a legal defense fund should probably have hired private investigators to get the proof that could be used to get warrants.

2021-01-08 06:16:32 UTC  

Hey, this is extremely important and I need you help! I have received a 56 minute audio recording claiming that Obama, Italy and even the EU have hacked in to our voting systems via internet and manipulated the votes. An Italian whistleblower who claims they uploaded the data has come out and said this. I need help in authentication of the audio.
My questions after listening:
1. Who is presenting this data
2. Why do they claim trump can’t always be informed
3. Why is the selection of the people on the call who they are?
The reason I want help in authentication is that I believe they need to put this on tomorrow’s livestream. If it’s true, it gets the word out, if it’s false, it stops this from spreading and causing more damage. I believe if this is true, it would mean an automatic win for trump.
Also, why is it on this service, why not zoom or snore established platform?
Audio link: https://vocaroo.com/1e976QE4oDoy

2021-01-08 06:17:19 UTC  

like i have no clue about those issues but my logic sensors go on overload when i hear that, just doesnt seem necessary or plausible

2021-01-08 06:17:23 UTC  

Get out of here with that.

2021-01-08 06:18:42 UTC  

We can't focus on paper let alone satellites