Quite simply, you test the paper, the ink, the printing on the paper, the lay out of the printing on the paper, the signatures on the ballots, and the signatures in the register.

i think it means keep looking until you find fraud, and if u dont find fraud its not complete.. that pulitzer guy wants to examine folds in the ballots and take ink samples, yes call CSI lol

There’s no signatures on ballots they are anonymous by law

Envelopes rather.

I’m not sure why “testing paper” was brought up that’s silly nonsense.

i had to sign for absentee ballot, but never when voting at a polling place

I'm sorry... that's rather ridiculous. You would have to have probable cause for anything like that. Not to mention that Trump WON Antrim county by 4,000 votes. If anyone was cheating, it would have been Trump.

Because people are accusing the counties of extra printing and China possibly printing ballots.

@LairdZach, you just advanced to level 10!

that would be Goldfish voter suppression. Pift

And if the ballots say made in China they wouldn’t work?

i heard that too but honestly why would democrats need Chinese to print up ballots, kinda far fetched if not backed up with hard evidence

Loads of people feel their was. Personally, I'm not one of them.

If you stopped for a second and thought about it... Imagine Clinton making similar assertions in 2016. People on the right were apoplectic about her campaign suing for recounts.

you could get a dna sample of the paper and track that it was not stolen from the rainforrest. Tree Lives Matter umm sorry too soon?

That was funny you can’t get a recount Hillary you lost. Let alone a lawsuit or any kind of testing

Maybe she should have. She conceded immediately.

im sure there was a ton of fraud in 2016 too, just not enuf.. thats why they never push hard on it.. they supposedly stole the nomination from Bernie too

LMAO when we couldnt do the simple recount nice LMAO

please stop you are making my sides hurt

True... There would be paper trails that should be easily investigated. Someone with a pile of cash for a legal defense fund should probably have hired private investigators to get the proof that could be used to get warrants.

Hey, this is extremely important and I need you help! I have received a 56 minute audio recording claiming that Obama, Italy and even the EU have hacked in to our voting systems via internet and manipulated the votes. An Italian whistleblower who claims they uploaded the data has come out and said this. I need help in authentication of the audio.
My questions after listening:
1. Who is presenting this data
2. Why do they claim trump can’t always be informed
3. Why is the selection of the people on the call who they are?
The reason I want help in authentication is that I believe they need to put this on tomorrow’s livestream. If it’s true, it gets the word out, if it’s false, it stops this from spreading and causing more damage. I believe if this is true, it would mean an automatic win for trump.
Also, why is it on this service, why not zoom or snore established platform?
Audio link: https://vocaroo.com/1e976QE4oDoy

like i have no clue about those issues but my logic sensors go on overload when i hear that, just doesnt seem necessary or plausible

Get out of here with that.

https://parler.com/post/1559b092ab1f4c32abdfe3857cd46247

We can't focus on paper let alone satellites

Hammer and scorecard, yeah yeah.

Next you will be telling be we will be invading Iran.

Trumps flaw was running the country like a corporation, just put leaders in a division and go golfing manage the managers... the ppl in his cabinet are all pretty bad ppl IMO.. Ben Carson is like maybe ok? john bolton , mattis, these are actual war criminals, and Pence is a freaking joke yeah

1000 people come in Antrim county to vote. Both parties verify no paper in locked ballot box or counted. Machines are on the floor all day. Every person signs their signature, shows ID, answers questions etc and chooses candidates. Dominion machine prints the choices you can verify who you voted is listed. Paper gets scanned and goes in the box like a paper ballot.

End of day results say 600 Trump 400 Biden are sent to county location, multiple clerk levels, canvassing election boards. Locked boxes with paper transported with both parties and sheriff to location. There’s a problem? Hand recount of all the ballots shows 600 Trump 400 Biden. What on earth at that point is paper and ink analysis done by a crazy person going to help at that point?

I listened to what I could understand of this the other night. It doesn't pass the smell test. This claims a remote vote switch via satellite. We have paper ballots now. Electronic only manipulation wouldn't work.

I could read this 2 ways... I'm not sure which is your intent.

That was what I’m wondering as wouldn’t the recounts have caught that.

man Parlor/facebook is getting just as bad as reddit for the left or 4-chan for the right! what have we become?

Because the issue, as I understand it, is with the mail ins and adjudication process.

Not in person voting.

i dont think China would need to print ballots it just doesnt make sense, i guess thats what im saying

It chould... the only place of the battleground states where they might have gotten away with it is Michigan where they have a whacky law that prevents them from auditing any precinct that is out of balance.

Didn’t Georgia do all electronic ballots though?

Or was that another state?

ive never heard of a state doing that, here we mark the ballot and insert into the machine that counts and tabulates