Message from @ShittyKitty
Discord ID: 796983446848667669
Hey, open forum. Plz jump in.
That would be awesome.
Except for the whole one party rule issue.
i need to thank @Eden for his/her take on the Ukraine thing he said what i was trying to but seemingly failing miserably.
The legislature wanted an independent audit. They have state certified election testing labs for that which either the state or Powell could have requested. Sidney made the court give up the machines to her fake expert instead though breaking chain of custody. Once a bad actor with admin rights have control of the machines independent testing becomes dicey.
Ouch!
It is quite hilarious.
To be fair... They said they imaged the drives and only examined the cloned drives.
They had the hardware though to “forensically examine”
Sure... Whatever that means. They didn't publish their methodology, so we can't say for certain.
I could care less about crack pot sidney. I wanted the legislature to look at the ballots, irrespective of the machines. Hand forensic audit, not a percentage recount using tabulators. That would have placated the right.
They did a hand recount of Antrim
I'm not sure what a hand forensic audit is, but I know that they did a hand recount in Antrim County and found that the totals were spot on.
More or less
Yes, that is not a complete forensic audit.
What is a complete forensic audit? Because it is a made up term with regards to elections. It is a term usually used for financial audits.
Nothing was going to “placate the right” they were making up tests 😂
it sounds good lol
It has that CSI feel... I can hear the Who in the background now.
Fingerprint and blood tests on every ballot
dna sample of you 1st born yea that could work...
Why stop there? Full DNA analysis... Spectrometer to test all foreign substances...
Quite simply, you test the paper, the ink, the printing on the paper, the lay out of the printing on the paper, the signatures on the ballots, and the signatures in the register.
i think it means keep looking until you find fraud, and if u dont find fraud its not complete.. that pulitzer guy wants to examine folds in the ballots and take ink samples, yes call CSI lol
There’s no signatures on ballots they are anonymous by law
Envelopes rather.
I’m not sure why “testing paper” was brought up that’s silly nonsense.
i had to sign for absentee ballot, but never when voting at a polling place
I'm sorry... that's rather ridiculous. You would have to have probable cause for anything like that. Not to mention that Trump WON Antrim county by 4,000 votes. If anyone was cheating, it would have been Trump.
Because people are accusing the counties of extra printing and China possibly printing ballots.
@LairdZach, you just advanced to level 10!
that would be Goldfish voter suppression. Pift
And if the ballots say made in China they wouldn’t work?
i heard that too but honestly why would democrats need Chinese to print up ballots, kinda far fetched if not backed up with hard evidence
Loads of people feel their was. Personally, I'm not one of them.
If you stopped for a second and thought about it... Imagine Clinton making similar assertions in 2016. People on the right were apoplectic about her campaign suing for recounts.
you could get a dna sample of the paper and track that it was not stolen from the rainforrest. Tree Lives Matter umm sorry too soon?
That was funny you can’t get a recount Hillary you lost. Let alone a lawsuit or any kind of testing