dont go on reddit

@ImNotGas Her name is Ashli Babbitt

@RobertGrulerEsq
https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer/status/1346948672936939525?s=09

Rob for president 2024 ✌

Well looks like Biden supporters won election based on what I am seeing at the moment, I sincerely hope he is a better president than I suspect.
Edited for spelling.

@Darkangael, you just advanced to level 8!

It really did sound like they gloated about her getting shot at first, and then everyone in comments called for Trump to be arrested and said that her blood was on his hands, even though they probably hated her guts anyways for being there.

If someone you don’t like gets murdered it’s still a crime. Weird statement

Door opened to just take elections without winning a court case sad

Door has already been opened to commit election fraud.

Say republicans in 2024 send watchers home and then add hundreds of thousands of ballots-what’s the recourse?

This literally shows why claiming that is absurd. Between winning an election and having to have evidence you won the election and declaring your opponents did not win an election without evidence to back it up it should be crystal clear which is more troubling and abusive

I asked a simple question. What’s the recourse?

Had they sent all GOP watchers home and added hundreds of thousands of votes they would have won in courts across the country.

How?

The legal recourse is presenting facts in courts which allow you to win. Disliking that you can’t win in courts without the facts is irrelevant.

The courts have ruled that the remedy is too great. How will you overcome that?

Filing proper lawsuits at proper times

But the remedy is to overturn the election results and the courts have already set precedent that they will not do that.

That’s not true at all had they proven more fraud than difference in votes they would have fixed it. If the most you can prove is worst case zero best case far short of needed votes of course the remedy on winning anyways is absurd

In 2024, you will present witness testimony of people being sent home, video of ballot coming from somewhere irregular being counted in machines, and statistical irregularities, and the courts will say “we will not overturn the election results.”

If you have a beef with how the voting system is run change it before millions of voters rights are up for grabs

Could you give me a scenario in which you believe a state or federal court would overturn election results based on 2020 rulings?

Large scale verifiable fraud

Still talking about this f****** s***....

Really

“Your honor, I present to you... large scale verifiable fraud.”

“Get out of here Lin wood.”

Lin wood never proved fraud he’s a clown

No plausible pathway@AdvanceManExtraordinaire

Plus what @Dedkraken said...

Dude Lynnwood is a clown

The courts didn’t say we will never change election results. They said if this is your remedy I’d like to see facts and evidence and you have presented none. That doesn’t mean what you think it means

Ok so you do it better than Lin wood. “Your honor, you must overturn the election results because _____”. You can make up anything you like.

You believed the evidence the judge did not because you set a low bar. Meet the courts bar and the outcome changes

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire what f****** judge is going to want their courtroom turned into a f****** circus? That's a real question.

The m************ will have damn people over at their goddamn house and s***...@AdvanceManExtraordinaire

I’m simply asking you specifically what evidence you think will get a court to overturn an election

If there was a plausible case to change the election results big tobacco lawyers would have filed it

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire no credible evidence presented for voter fraud at the scale required...

Not with anything that anybody's laid out as a plausible pathway @AdvanceManExtraordinaire