You have to hop the data around to cover its tracks... just like an onion server

That would be perfectly within the capabilities of a Satellite, yes?

Right... So there are satellite receivers in Germany with the correct decryption keys and transponder settings connected to a network that can receive these instructions??? It's not like radio. There is a lot of equipment needed on the receiving end.

@TaLoN132 - not saying this is facts, but hard to say this guy would not know satellites and the equipment needed. . . https://youtu.be/YwtbK5XXAMk

Yes. Both sides would have to be able to initiate the handshake

@deMontfort, you just advanced to level 6!

I'm sorry... this sounds like a concocted story to try and fit the "Army seized servers in Frankfurt" story.

It's usually not a handshake... Satellite communication is a one-way transmission with a back channel to request missed packets.

Also, that "affidavit" is hearsay.

@TaLoN132 Perhaps... but that isn’t the dispute currently. One at a time. -As a satellite expert, you can confirm this explanation is within the capabilities of a satellite, yes?

As I said. Im not the satellite expert 🙂

Affidavits by an swarm Officer of the Court (an Attorney), is not considered heresy. It is admissible as their account.

I'm not exactly an expert, per se... I have worked with satellites and was the data expert that designed a software solution for Boeing Digital Systems.

I have very specific information on how satellites are used for transmitting and receiving data.

For sure. I understand. I’m not expecting you are a wizard. But my account of how the data was transferred through the satellite is within the capabilities of a satellite’s performance capabilities, yes?

According to your understanding...

I just want to be sure I’ve explained this piece fully

@TaLoN132 I understand your apprehension. I can still understand your doubts despite the Satellite concern... and we can get to those as well. ... But you can confirm that the data transfer as I described is within the capabilities of a satellite, yes?

@deMontfort OK... I was just watching the video that Jenna shared. He clearly claims that the satellite connection was used for 2-way communication, which means they would have also needed a transponder in Germany. And then he says that they looped in the American Embassy, where it took place...

Sorry... This is complete nonsense. There was no algorithm that got overloaded. No electronic hack would be able to produce paper ballots that matched the vote totals during the hand recounts and risk limiting audits in each of these states. It is simply not possible.

Satellite communication is a ridiculous solution for this when solutions like VPN's are readily available, completely secure, software configurable, have no bandwidth or back channel requirements, and can be dropped into a location and easily removed - no antennae, receiver/transponders and other equipment.

Why is tracing data packets between servers “loopy”?

What do you mean? Who used the term loopy?

Alright. I’ll use your term. Let’s substitute your word. “nonsense”.

Data packets only exist at the time that it occurred. It would require a packet sniffer sitting somewhere between point A and point X while the transmissions are occurring. You can't trace packets after the fact.

Also, vote tabulation did not occur outside the USA. This was a basic misunderstanding of how Scytl - a Barcelona based company - was being used. I first heard this mischaracterization from a report that Russ Ramsland created when he started investigating Dominion after he lost his election bid in 2016. Scytl does have online voting system that are used elsewhere, but not in the US. The US locations use an Election Night dashboard service that are used to display vote totals by race/measure. Ramsland asserted that the untabulated ballots were sent to Scytl, who's AWS based servers were in Frankfurt Germany.

I also do recall when I was in the military, we had a mobile send/receive Satellite at all times. It was never my duty to man it, but I was trained on setting it up once.

I also worked on the JTRS project for Boeing in Huntington Beach, CA - I wrote an Encryption key management component and managed remotely a team in Huntsville Alabama. There were satellite capabilities on the platform, but it was primarily voice-based when I worked on it.

@TaLoN132 You not going to get those technical specs from a high level brief. Barking at the wrong people. And you’re just not gonna get your hands on the machines for the questions you think you’re gonna get an answer to

On a high level..... the Satellites have the capability to send and receive the type of data between Germany and Italy.... and Germany servers conducted the “hacking”. It’s just the way it. If you want to dive into your technical geeking out, you’ll need to hop on a plane and convince the nerds you need to be on the team.

Not sure what you mean by that...

I am more concerned with how places like GA could conduct a full hand recount (something nobody could have predicted) and have it tie out almost exactly. Also, since the majority of Biden's votes were via Mail-in, someone would have to infiltrate each mail-in ballot processing center and replace Trump Ballots with fake Biden Ballots - without significantly altering down ballot races, which a few were also recounted.

Keep in mind that precincts do not have the same ballots (for example, in the City of Detroit, there are 600 precincts and over 250 ballot configurations (and there are in-person and mail-in versions of each one). So, they would have to sneak into each location and swap them out and get out without being caught or disturbing chain of custody seals.

Also, you can't just add votes. They know how many ballots are cast based on the voter rolls - in-person signatures/check-in and received/processed mail-in ballots checked against the rolls as received to prevent double voting. So, an algorithm designed to manufacture votes for Biden when Trump hits certain thresholds is an idea that someone who knew nothing about how elections are run would come up with.

ok the argument "I am more concerned with how places like GA could conduct a full hand recount (something nobody could have predicted) and have it tie out almost exactly. " umm if thats the way it happened but no. Same people that counted what are going to tell on themselves? Like the guy that took the TV from you house you dont claim did it you find the TV 1st. they dont just say hay look at this tv i took. Or when you ask to see in the house what do you think happen?

As for "for example, in the City of Detroit, there are 600 precincts and over 250 ballot configurations' what the heck is 250 ballot configurations? not sure if the 600 precincts are in Detroit seems a bit off as there are only like 980 in the entire county of Wayne where this city is located. so 250 configurations seems off they try very hard to keep them the same for the collection centers aka Cobo hall err now as of 2019 now TCF Center. possible you are referencing state wide 86 county's (i think) or for both primary and general elections. but yea every yr many problems and always downplayed from the media. here is an articaul about it https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/08/20/benson-asked-investigate-detroit-perfect-storm-voting-problems/5616629002/ as for the last statement you had about machines cannot change votes it is called mass adjudication interesting enuf there is a record of this but in Antrim County 2020 adjudication records missing Weird have them in the machine for previous elections. Just have another look at the report if you like. but the biggest kick in the teeth was when SOS saying trump could have request a hand recount of the entire state if he suspected fraud. then blocked all requests.

Testing. Testing. New to discord

You're good, yep!

you get that the people hand recounting the votes and the folks running the precincts are different people right? Local ballots have different cofigurations to custom include different local races but the same national races. If you wanted to break the system you would have to replace some of a wide variety of different configutations obviously if you just added 50k votes to a precinct that only has 3000 people that voted it would be pretty easy to detect the problems you are imagining but not explaining.

did they really try to make it look that? They went after satellites being used? I've heard better reasoning on Judge Judy

how did someone like Lin Wood ever pass the bar, cause God knows I couldn't.

Who knows? Maybe he had a brain at one point.

Until the democrat cabal lobotomized him and stole it to sacrifice its intellectual capacities to Biden.

Did he actually tweet that? Jesus...

At some point, it was no longer about what happened, but about what they could make people believe happened. This universal theory attempted to connect all of the dots about German servers being seized, votes being tabulated overseas, remote vote flipping (without any need to correct the paper ballot record to match, apparently), vote stoppages overseas, algorithms that broke the system to manufacture Biden votes (without any attempt to balance with voter roll counts), and... that's when I stopped listening because it had gone beyond the point of absurdity...

The new twist on this one is that it supposedly involved Barrack Obama, the CIA/FBI/MI6, the US Embassy in Italy, and Vatican owned satellites... because satellites can apparently create magical bidirectional connections into any network.

The Vatican? Maybe the Pope was behind Epstein's suicide too.

Would you agree everything would’ve been completely alleviated if all of the access to audit signatures, software and hardware was allowed? No raid on the Capitol?