Message from @Rievous
Discord ID: 782010096850436146
Since when
Wait, no, I think I misinterpreted Trumpetition
Court can order a recount and find constitutional violation of changing election laws in each state without legislature approval
That is all they can do
A criminal investigation would need some sort of recording and videos from the election workers and offical stating that they have been cheating and should be arrested
That is what sidney is doing
In Bush vs. Gore. The court decided to end the election after the recount was finished because of deadline regulation.
There is a certain extend that the court gets tired of listening to voter fraud when there has already been a recount
and end a election from there
Recounts don't help
They are just recounting fraudlent ballots without challenging them.
Meaning Nothing is gonna change
They need to audit and throw ballots out
In GA they identifed (through private means) that there were 20k+ voters who moved states before the election and still voted by mail. The margin in GA is only like 10~
If the courts block the certification by means of litigations and the governor tries to appeal it. It will end up going to the general assembly (Legislator branch). The state election and governor does not decide the electorals as stated in the 12 amendment " Article 2 section 1 Claus 2 "Each state as a legistator thereof direct a number of electors"
Bush v gore wasnt the courts getting tired of hearing about fraud. They stopped it because the democrats were violating the equal protections clause by holding some ballots to a different standard.
any updates lads?
Which is why rudy points out in PA that ballots from some counties were allowed to be "cured" while most could not.
Hey lads I'm gonna post an update in General-shitposting, can someone elaborate it?
no
What do you mean by violating equal protection clause?
such as holding some ballots to a different standards?
They were counting votes different. Holding the ballots in miami dade to a different standard than the rest of the state.
Do you think there will be violation under the equal protection clause as Rudy stated?
There already is?
Is it possible to make taco salad and not overload your plate?
There obviously is. My faith in the judicial system is somewhat wanting though.
Its not just faith. Its about evidence that they can prove in the judicial system
Where is the evidence?
\
I know they start counting in the day of night and they stated that they were going to be closing the election office
They coralled poll watchers into pens, there is video eveidence of that, and then they boarded up the windows so nobody could see in
also video evidence of that
In that time period hundreds of thousands of ballots were counted with no way of being challenged
Compared to 2016 we had HUNDREDS of thousands more mail in ballots. In 2016 the rejection rate was up in the 3-10% range with only tens of thousands of ballots. In 2020 the rejection rate dropped to <1% despite there being hundreds of thousands of ballots more.
There is a difference between being present and observating the ballots. And so the election offical had to change the rules to prevent people from getting any closer.
Their 'rule changing' also went against the constituion. The pennselvaniyan court doesn't have the power to change election rules, that goes to the state legislature, yet the PA court did anyway
The state legislature claim that they will not change the outcome of the election
The state legislature will attend Judy Guliani committe hearing
Iāve been in the woods. What have I missed?
PA gonna go to scotus