u see how the argument stops working when it’s flipped? for no reason?

That kinda reminds me of another statistic hmm it has something to do with 13% and 50%

60.7/83. it’s still a huge gap

that’s... the point...

And a lot of murder, usually have more context then that Lilian

great, so we agree. why do u use it against blm then?

she said that percentages like these are not a valid reason to attack a certain race

they are

@Grape

They claim that “blacks are targeted, and incarcerated at a higher rate then whites”.. that’s why.

why not

I say we attack white people

then why can’t i use it to say we should castrate all white men?

It isn’t attacking the race

say that

we should

Because no one is saying arrest all blacks

Gay @Al <3

I'm white

GG @Ernesto, you just advanced to level 2!

something that has been proven lol but that’s not the topic rn

take my penis off

okay, not castrate all men

castrate more of them

arrest more of them

then we can hang all black men

Yes

I say we kill blacks

Who the hell pinged me 11 times

I'm being sarcastic

**They aren’t targeted, though. If they commit a crime, then they’re going to be punished. They commit a higher rate of crime, so they’re incarcerated at a higher rate**

why does ur argument work when u say “oh police brutality and murder is okay because of 13/50” but when i say “oh higher rates of castration are okay because of 60/83” it’s not okay?

that’s literally where ur wrong lol

Police brutality? You’re a 16 year old imbecile with daddy issues. Obviously, you have no idea of what you speak.

when it comes to drugs, they don’t actually commit higher rates of crime. and that’s the main issue/crime they get arrested for.
the other crimes are due to underlying issues of poverty and systemic racism and a history of oppression. obviously communities with worse socioeconomic factors will commit more crimes.

No one is saying that’s okay. Not one. But there isn’t those issues. Those men were doing something wrong, and threatened the officers lives.

it has been proven psychologically that when ur living in worse socioeconomic conditions, ur more likely to be violent/commit crimes

there's no evidence that blacks face a statistically significant higher risk of being shot by police. If you look at multiple factor analysis (MFA) studies that account for factors such as violent crime overrepresentation in the black population. Some studies even find whites are more likely to be shot when accounting for these factors.

That's because whites get off the hook more
Versus a black dude with like only an eight of weed that'll get sent to jail

Duh

that’s literally the flaw in ur argument tho.
i’m saying “hey this system is discriminating against certain people and arresting them at high rates”
and ur argument is “oh well this same exact system has reported and arrested more black people” like yeah no shit that’s the issue.
but according to actual research that isn’t funded by this same system, white people commit even more drug offenses than black people