what type of debate is happening here

idk

that’s the point. they do. they use the argument of 13 50 (which has no actual valid basis) to justify police brutality and murder of black men

okay

?

so did u say it and misspoke or did u not say it lol?

https://tenor.com/view/parksandrec-yourewrong-adam-scott-ben-wyatt-gif-4683216

so... committing high rates of child molestation should lead to higher rates of castration or androgen blockers

Just look again, ffs.. that’s a stupid question. I did not say it depends on race. I’m saying that’s not something you can judge due to race.

u see how the argument stops working when it’s flipped? for no reason?

That kinda reminds me of another statistic hmm it has something to do with 13% and 50%

60.7/83. it’s still a huge gap

that’s... the point...

And a lot of murder, usually have more context then that Lilian

great, so we agree. why do u use it against blm then?

she said that percentages like these are not a valid reason to attack a certain race

they are

@Grape

They claim that “blacks are targeted, and incarcerated at a higher rate then whites”.. that’s why.

why not

I say we attack white people

then why can’t i use it to say we should castrate all white men?

It isn’t attacking the race

say that

we should

Because no one is saying arrest all blacks

Gay @Al <3

I'm white

GG @Ernesto, you just advanced to level 2!

something that has been proven lol but that’s not the topic rn

take my penis off

okay, not castrate all men

castrate more of them

arrest more of them

then we can hang all black men

Yes

I say we kill blacks

Who the hell pinged me 11 times

I'm being sarcastic

**They aren’t targeted, though. If they commit a crime, then they’re going to be punished. They commit a higher rate of crime, so they’re incarcerated at a higher rate**

why does ur argument work when u say “oh police brutality and murder is okay because of 13/50” but when i say “oh higher rates of castration are okay because of 60/83” it’s not okay?