Errr....not sure about that, but.

Capitalist Libertarians are pretty unique to English actually

Libertarianism is a form of liberalism

what type of crack are you smoking

You know what libertarianism i am talking about.

If there were an individualism role I'd assign that to myself. As far right and as far libertarian as possible.

No like libertarianism the label started off as a socialist label

Individualism can be leftist as well, I'm an individualist

Im pretty sure that. Libertarianism was a term adopted by classical liberals once statists started utilizing the term 'liberal'

Disagree with that definition of individualism.

"Libertarianism originated as a form of left-wing politics such as anti-authoritarian and anti-state socialists like anarchists,[6] especially social anarchists,[7] but more generally libertarian communists/Marxists and libertarian socialists.[8][9] These libertarians seek to abolish capitalism and private ownership of the means of production, or else to restrict their purview or effects to usufruct property norms, in favor of common or cooperative ownership and management, viewing private property as a barrier to freedom and liberty.[10][11][12][13]"

Sorry about the bad format

But yeah it's from leftist anarchism

I'm a classical libertarian

It was adopted by capitalists later

Ok. But, Libertarian, is the term It is ***now***.

Still used by socialists mostly in non-english countries

Libertarianism as capitalism is unique to English speakers

Also I dont see How you can be pro Liberty, yet, abolish capitalism and use coercion to have others avoid from bartering for goods and services?

Because the social construct of ownership is inherently coercive

Gross.

It's true

Example:

You wash up on an island, the island is full of berry bushes

These berry bushes are owned by someone, but if you do not eat them you will die

From starvation

In this way, you are forced to die to respect their property

You can only own what you can defend.

Honestly sounds like a personal problem

Exactly, you only own what you can defend through coercive violence.

Thing is. We are within a society where you are able to acquire a good, voluntarily, according to your demand. Specially with how globalized the world is.

Though...by trying to steal. You are starting coercion.

Your sense of 'coercion' is merely self defense.

Stealing presupposes property

You're basically putting forward a modified Heinz Dilemma

Doesn't justify It.

And saying that it's moral to steal the drug.

If it is this or die, then you are coerced into action.

The only reason scarcity exists in nature is because of original sin, and humanity transgressing the perfect law of God.

So coercion is part of the curse of Genesis.

We are compelled to deal with it by Natural Law.