It did not

checkmate

yes it is

That's both not what it says and not a moral claim

you claim morality exists,

yet it is relative

i asked you specifically if it didnt exist

based on how you worded it earlier, you believe moral truth exists, but only relative to every individual

Yes. That's not a moral claim

That's not saying something is good or bad

thats why after i made my argument i said "now you must choose between moral nihilism and moral objectivism"

it is a moral claim

It is not

by saying morality is on an individual basis,

you claim some things are bad (morally) to an individual

It is a claim about morality

if you misspoke and meant morality doesnt exist, say so

Of course morality exists dumbass

it absolutely is a moral claim to say morality exists on an individual basis

You don't know what a moral claim is

That's the takeaway

by making that claim, you are making a moral judgement on every action

And because of that, you cannot see the flaw

no, you just want to cling to a position i disproved

I asked you many times based on your moral subjectivism

about specific moral scenarios

Ok, so let's assume you disproved subjectivism

and you used your moral claim to consistently claim the same thing

That means objectivism is right

no

it means objectivism or nihilism is right

Fair enough. Moral nihilism is always an option. You have to answer the question "is it possible to make a moral claim with any validity"

you cant jump back and forth

choose, moral nihilism or moral subjectivism

I didn't jump back and forth. Take a breather kid

you said,

"Fair enough. Moral nihilism is always an option. "

this implies you are willing to jump to it

No it doesn't

even though it is very different from moral relatvism'

it does