If anybody remembered me for being an intellectual masturbator I’d be dissapointed

the argument is solid. it destroys moral relativism. now you must either choose moral nihilism or moral objectivism

or does my argument subjectively hurt your feelings ? :0

The argument is not solid

@Norman it doesn’t ive heard the actual argument for moral relativism

its something i couldn’t disprove

You barely understand the terms of the Philosophical discussion on the subject of morality. You definitely have found a solution to objectivism or subjectivism

To everyone reading this rn you’re beautiful

Thanks cuh got me tearin up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8oUqG_k1zE

this is where i got the argument from

he is super smart philosopher that knows everything

Cringe

Neither is an appeal to authority

i didnt appealing to authority

i posted video where he makes the argument

then i added a WWE style introduction

It's a straw man argument. It incorrectly defines moral relativism in order to attack it

no it doesnt

it accurately portrays it

I mean no it doesn't but that's fine.

Relativism isn't that "there are no objective truths and nothing it knowable" which is the definition that argument relies on to make it self referential and thus self defeating

no

it made a moral claim

Only that there are no moral truths, fundamental to the universe. It itself isn't a moral truth proposition. Relativism isn't a moral proposition itself

while saying no moral claims

It did not

checkmate

yes it is

That's both not what it says and not a moral claim

you claim morality exists,

yet it is relative

i asked you specifically if it didnt exist

based on how you worded it earlier, you believe moral truth exists, but only relative to every individual

Yes. That's not a moral claim

That's not saying something is good or bad

thats why after i made my argument i said "now you must choose between moral nihilism and moral objectivism"

it is a moral claim