Message from @Lavender Eagle

Discord ID: 757728482120826911


2020-09-21 20:53:05 UTC  

Proverbs 9:8
β€œReprove not a scorner, lest he hate thee: rebuke a wise man, and he will love thee.”

2020-09-21 20:53:17 UTC  

Ok, I rebuke you.

2020-09-21 20:53:20 UTC  

is scorn or love being made?

2020-09-21 20:53:30 UTC  

are you sowing in dead soil?

2020-09-21 20:53:35 UTC  

Now love me, by stopping with your self-righteous blathering

2020-09-21 22:12:51 UTC  

I believe that the President should appoint a man to the US Supreme Court, because God intended for the man to lead the household, and I believe that applies to all scales of leadership in church and government.

When we deviate from what God intended, we see dysfunction in society, and I believe this is confirmed in what we see around us today.

Thank you, love you all.

2020-09-21 22:15:02 UTC  

200+ messages.....wow this week's question must be a really good one if i can find it lol

2020-09-21 22:18:14 UTC  

Should The President appoint a man or a woman to the US Supreme Court?

2020-09-21 22:19:13 UTC  

I had trouble myself finding it hahaha it's buried in the messages

2020-09-21 22:19:18 UTC  

A man would be better, I had predicted in a discussion on here that the trap for Trump would be to send another woman up there. In the short term picking a woman is a decent political move that may pay off, but in the long term it's not a good idea, the woman is more likely to flip on key issues

2020-09-21 22:20:07 UTC  

plus the argument is that a woman is needed for representation since RBG is a woman, but this argument is nullfied imo since yea all ready have that dyke Kagana and the illegal Sotomayor

2020-09-21 22:20:27 UTC  

yea lmao

2020-09-21 22:20:33 UTC  

I don’t think gender changes or really signifies anything

2020-09-21 22:20:48 UTC  

well it definitely does, especialyl for the Supreme Court

2020-09-21 22:20:59 UTC  

> A man would be better, I had predicted in a discussion on here that the trap for Trump would be to send another woman up there. In the short term picking a woman is a decent political move that may pay off, but in the long term it's not a good idea, the woman is more likely to flip on key issues
@Japheth well put

2020-09-21 22:21:08 UTC  

in case you haven't noticed so-caleld "conservative" women usualyl aren't

2020-09-21 22:21:13 UTC  

Trump is obviously pandering to women lamo

2020-09-21 22:21:36 UTC  

it's part pandering, but part of it is ideological trap

2020-09-21 22:22:06 UTC  

Everybody likes to call Trump stupid and shit but it’s just not true whatsoever

2020-09-21 22:22:12 UTC  

like i said the high ideological argument is representation and then especialyl in replacing Ginsberg whom was not jsut a long serving female but a feminist icon

2020-09-21 22:22:28 UTC  

What does the Supreme Court even do

2020-09-21 22:22:38 UTC  

Highest court in the land is all I know

2020-09-21 22:23:30 UTC  

my strategy when we were discussing this elsewhere would be to instead nomiante a conservative black man. This fulfills some of the pomp and politics of the election, the representation argument, and if we pick wisely getting one in the mold of Clarence Thomas, insulates us against possible compromisers with the liberals

2020-09-21 22:25:07 UTC  

the Supreme Court's original function was to interpret and clarify on matters of the Constitution, but the SCOTUS in the modern era has been used as a way to force through some of the most egregious leftwing abominations namely abortion and the great blasphemy against marriage

2020-09-21 22:27:36 UTC  

this has made the SCOTUS now a key battlefield in US politics since on one hand they can be used past their bounds as unoffiicial law makers, and on the other hand to legally undo all the abominations and whoredoms perpetrated in the past half a century the conservatives have to retake the SCOTUS and overturn the madness

2020-09-21 23:08:55 UTC  

Gotcha

2020-09-21 23:20:42 UTC  

BQ answer: President Trump should appoint whoever he decides is the best choice to preserve the Constitution and the country, regardless of sex. It does seem he's leaning towards a woman so when the leftists start shrieking, he can call them sexist like when JLP trolls liberals and calls them racist.

2020-09-22 01:57:46 UTC  

Kanye and Trump?

2020-09-22 01:57:56 UTC  

Kanye would get the black vote

2020-09-22 02:06:05 UTC  

The birthday party Kanye West baby

2020-09-22 05:17:41 UTC  

Right

2020-09-22 06:08:09 UTC  

πŸ”πŸƒπŸΏβ€β™‚οΈπŸƒπŸΏβ€β™‚οΈπŸƒπŸΏβ€β™‚οΈπŸƒπŸΏβ€β™‚οΈ

2020-09-22 07:34:04 UTC  

You need to focus on keeping the White vote.

Also it should be a man for the SCOTUS. No more women in the courts.

2020-09-22 07:36:38 UTC  

No pandering with a black guy or a Mexican or Asian justice. Let's be real and understand what we need. Tbh kavanaugh wasn't even that good of a pick. He's a beta male. There must be one strong non female POC who can get the job done.

2020-09-22 08:31:05 UTC  

@scarlett bear hey chief

2020-09-22 08:31:19 UTC  

this you?

2020-09-22 08:31:19 UTC  
2020-09-22 09:08:18 UTC  

you don't have to pander with a black guy, just pick one that is actualyl conservative and will not flip flop

2020-09-22 09:11:34 UTC  

but i think that Trump will probably be dead set on picking a woman, i am sure his advisors have mal-advised him on this matter. It makes sense in the short term as a political manuever, it's just taking the long view it's very often women turn or end up compromising with the left

2020-09-22 10:41:12 UTC  

great input champ. as usual. but it needs to be a man. Trump has to make that choice unapologetically.

2020-09-22 10:42:19 UTC  

i agree, but i think he will at least try to push a woman first