build up your brother, dont tear them down

I am building up a fapper so he'll stop fapping

that between him and Abba

Even though I clearly said I dont.

he's a pathological fapulator

go do that in snake pit maybe

@chumba so why do you think I do again?

Fappy McFappington

Yeah ok.

Fapalonious Monk

only a wrongful zealot or queer worries about another mans wiener unless he is in adultery or fornication

Fapulatron

<:nuke:494352215713251328>

@chumba Lol ok now you're the one sounding 14

@Shalom now you're getting simpy

spare me the new age terms, iam not familiar with such

these are 4chan words

Proverbs 9:8
“Reprove not a scorner, lest he hate thee: rebuke a wise man, and he will love thee.”

Ok, I rebuke you.

is scorn or love being made?

are you sowing in dead soil?

Now love me, by stopping with your self-righteous blathering

I believe that the President should appoint a man to the US Supreme Court, because God intended for the man to lead the household, and I believe that applies to all scales of leadership in church and government.

When we deviate from what God intended, we see dysfunction in society, and I believe this is confirmed in what we see around us today.

Thank you, love you all.

200+ messages.....wow this week's question must be a really good one if i can find it lol

Should The President appoint a man or a woman to the US Supreme Court?

I had trouble myself finding it hahaha it's buried in the messages

A man would be better, I had predicted in a discussion on here that the trap for Trump would be to send another woman up there. In the short term picking a woman is a decent political move that may pay off, but in the long term it's not a good idea, the woman is more likely to flip on key issues

plus the argument is that a woman is needed for representation since RBG is a woman, but this argument is nullfied imo since yea all ready have that dyke Kagana and the illegal Sotomayor

yea lmao

I don’t think gender changes or really signifies anything

well it definitely does, especialyl for the Supreme Court

> A man would be better, I had predicted in a discussion on here that the trap for Trump would be to send another woman up there. In the short term picking a woman is a decent political move that may pay off, but in the long term it's not a good idea, the woman is more likely to flip on key issues
@Japheth well put

in case you haven't noticed so-caleld "conservative" women usualyl aren't

Trump is obviously pandering to women lamo

it's part pandering, but part of it is ideological trap

Everybody likes to call Trump stupid and shit but it’s just not true whatsoever

like i said the high ideological argument is representation and then especialyl in replacing Ginsberg whom was not jsut a long serving female but a feminist icon

What does the Supreme Court even do

Highest court in the land is all I know

my strategy when we were discussing this elsewhere would be to instead nomiante a conservative black man. This fulfills some of the pomp and politics of the election, the representation argument, and if we pick wisely getting one in the mold of Clarence Thomas, insulates us against possible compromisers with the liberals

the Supreme Court's original function was to interpret and clarify on matters of the Constitution, but the SCOTUS in the modern era has been used as a way to force through some of the most egregious leftwing abominations namely abortion and the great blasphemy against marriage