The inverse could also be true, allowing for the certification of questionable results such as what we are seeing in an election where more than the required margin in many states is being disputed will disenfranchise those who cast their ballot fairly. There must be some remedy in these kinds of situations that exists

I.e signature matching, forensic audit of ballots, ect. which those elected refuse to do themselves and most courts won't allow for an evidentiary hearing due to procedural issues

There is an assumption built into your position "questionable results" and problems that would switch the results. I have yet to see any reliable evidence of that...

And again... you have to establish that the other folks votes were not counted.

And nothing like that has happened

"I.e signature matching, forensic audit of ballots, ect. which those elected refuse to do themselves and most courts won't allow for an evidentiary hearing due to procedural issues"

That does not and should not automatically kick in simply because someone is not happy with the results.

This isn't simply about people being "Unhappy". There are thousands of affiants and many expert witnesses who have testified on a myriad of issues regarding the electoral process this year. You can also take a look at Matt Braynard's compelling analysis if you want something more "reliable". When you're met with all of this, ask yourself why there is such adversity as to clear up the whole matter with a simple signature audit of the votes (ex. GAsec. has lied promising to do this many times and has not despite many concerns that grow everyday) or a forensic audit that would solidify Biden's win and leave no room for argument? Instead you have many leaders in these states rushing to certify results and ignore the concerns of their citizens. Until people know for certain that this was a "free and fair election" rather than relying on the word of those in charge who would be responsible, I will remain skeptical and stand by those who want answers.

@Fefe, you just advanced to level 2!

Link to Matt Braynard's findings here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XH9ihoLi1NA&feature=emb_title

@shahtirth94 LA County has a population that is greater than that of 41 individual U.S. states.

That's ashame.

Thought we could all use a laugh

I know the Dominion thing is a bit of a red herring

It's that they didn't verify signatures and voter rolls

So, with 18 states joining in on the Texas suit against GA, PA, MI, and WI, what weight (if any) does that add to the suit in general?

It certainly shows SCOTUS that more States agree with the filing than just Texas.

@jfindley

and the amount of electoral votes those States represent is pretty high

Arizona just joined it

Source?

@Discopainter joined what?

The suit apparently. Waiting on a source.

believe me trump bye bye, what ever happened because masonry club does not want to trump any more, and masonry club controls the world 😎

by the way, trump is the most person who serve masonry club but its card just burn 😁

??

On the SCOTUS website

@Discopainter, you just advanced to level 4!

Masonry Club does not want trump any more, he has no chance 🤣

https://twitter.com/generalbrnovich/status/1336806089329790976?s=21

trump need go immediately to Saudi Arabia and suck the dick king 🤣 😂

Interesting... Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice signed on to the TX suit.

Proof?

all this is unformal

How

http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163248/20201209163606702_TX%20v.%20PA%20Motion%20and%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf

Roy S. Moore, a West Point graduate and Vietnam veteran who has served as an Etowah County (AL) Circuit Judge, has twice been elected Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, and is a member of the Bar of this Court; John Eidsmoe, a retired Air Force Judge Advocate who serves as Professor of Constitutional Law for the Oak Brook College of Law and Government Policy, has taught constitutional law for the O.W. Coburn School of Law at Oral Roberts University and the Thomas Goode Jones School of Law at Faulkner University, and is a member of the Bar of this Court;

Former Supreme Court Justice

Oh, interesting...