Message from @codyhere2004
Discord ID: 786384732912091206
and the amount of electoral votes those States represent is pretty high
Arizona just joined it
Source?
@Discopainter joined what?
The suit apparently. Waiting on a source.
believe me trump bye bye, what ever happened because masonry club does not want to trump any more, and masonry club controls the world 😎
by the way, trump is the most person who serve masonry club but its card just burn 😁
??
On the SCOTUS website
@Discopainter, you just advanced to level 4!
Masonry Club does not want trump any more, he has no chance 🤣
trump need go immediately to Saudi Arabia and suck the dick king 🤣 😂
Interesting... Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice signed on to the TX suit.
Proof?
all this is unformal
How
Roy S. Moore, a West Point graduate and Vietnam veteran who has served as an Etowah County (AL) Circuit Judge, has twice been elected Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, and is a member of the Bar of this Court; John Eidsmoe, a retired Air Force Judge Advocate who serves as Professor of Constitutional Law for the Oak Brook College of Law and Government Policy, has taught constitutional law for the O.W. Coburn School of Law at Oral Roberts University and the Thomas Goode Jones School of Law at Faulkner University, and is a member of the Bar of this Court;
Oh, interesting...
That abridged CV he put in there made me think he still held that position...
Interesting stuff
@Fefe, you just advanced to level 3!
Why would that guy be filing anything, then?
Some justices on the Supreme Court believe that SCOTUS has to hear lawsuits regarding states suing states
Interesting. The Kelly case is not on the Docket search anymore.
It seems to me that the most significant issues here, IMO, were barely skimmed over if not completely disregarded, resulted in eliminating any perceived transparency and fairness in the election results. These issues, being the “chain of custody” and the rules [of having Dem. and GOP pole workers/watchers sharing in the process], are absolutely vital and must be strictly enforced in each and every election going forward. I honestly believe that if this election had been properly supervised, followed the lawful procedures, and pole watchers had been allowed to actually observe and given a real voice in the challenge process, that the outcome could have been much less contentious. By properly following the procedures, any reported problems that might arise could be easily verified and proven by examining the logs and signatures in the chain of custody, putting the controversy to rest. And as long as there is accountability and strict adherence on chain of custody in the voter registration office in verifying the signature and residential address of the voters, the process should be considered fair and legitimate to all. If this election had been operated honestly and correctly, there would have been no reason what so ever for election officials not to simply verify any concerns or challenge to the vote counting as they occurred. We will experience the same if not a more serious situation in a few weeks if the election laws and procedures are not completely understood and precisely complied with, under penalty of law with serious consequences.
@SassyCate NO
😌
@SassyCate write fast and little
@TomWiliam += One Past Last Jedi, you just advanced to level 5!
no???😥
!rank
@SassyCate do summary
brevity is not my strong point, But I said all i need to say...
Have the 4 states responses to SCOTUS been made public yet?
They are due by 3pm.
I was hoping that they wouldn't wait until the 3pm EST deadline...