Yeah... so technically the case can continue through the normal process but the SCOTUS is not gonna do anything to stop the Certification of the PA vote and the sending of Electors.
But it does not look like the Court issued an order on whether or not the stuff surrounding Act 77 was Unconstitutional or not. It well could be. I think intelligent people can disagree on it.
But the Court seems to be making it clear that not certifying the election and thereby disenfranchising millions of voters is not on the table as a remedy. Which I wholeheartedly agree with
Legally speaking... I can not see an argument where disenfranchising millions for people who followed the law and cast their vote in a way prescribed by law and in good faith is the proper answer.
The inverse could also be true, allowing for the certification of questionable results such as what we are seeing in an election where more than the required margin in many states is being disputed will disenfranchise those who cast their ballot fairly. There must be some remedy in these kinds of situations that exists
I.e signature matching, forensic audit of ballots, ect. which those elected refuse to do themselves and most courts won't allow for an evidentiary hearing due to procedural issues
There is an assumption built into your position "questionable results" and problems that would switch the results. I have yet to see any reliable evidence of that...
And again... you have to establish that the other folks votes were not counted.
"I.e signature matching, forensic audit of ballots, ect. which those elected refuse to do themselves and most courts won't allow for an evidentiary hearing due to procedural issues"
That does not and should not automatically kick in simply because someone is not happy with the results.
This isn't simply about people being "Unhappy". There are thousands of affiants and many expert witnesses who have testified on a myriad of issues regarding the electoral process this year. You can also take a look at Matt Braynard's compelling analysis if you want something more "reliable". When you're met with all of this, ask yourself why there is such adversity as to clear up the whole matter with a simple signature audit of the votes (ex. GAsec. has lied promising to do this many times and has not despite many concerns that grow everyday) or a forensic audit that would solidify Biden's win and leave no room for argument? Instead you have many leaders in these states rushing to certify results and ignore the concerns of their citizens. Until people know for certain that this was a "free and fair election" rather than relying on the word of those in charge who would be responsible, I will remain skeptical and stand by those who want answers.
