Message from @Just A Dad Gamer
Discord ID: 787103157700263977
Junk for several reasons. It's political theater. They know these things won't stand.
> 155, ORIG. TEXAS V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
> The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of
> complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of
> the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially
> cognizable interest in the manner in which another State
> conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed
> as moot.
> Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins:
> In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a
> bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original
> jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___
> (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore
> grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not
> grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.
> They are calling it a dead end
@Anacaona Junk for several reasons. It's political theater. They know these things won't stand.
I can't find the opinion yet
got it
Awesome. You're a pro. Lol
going live
@Uncivil Law You presenting this tonight?
@Uncivil Law Nvm be right there.
no like right now as fast as I can boot up OBS
Where are you going live? I want to listen in. They are saying the case was dismissed 30 minutes after Texas filed their response.
I hate CNN- they are enjoying this
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/121120zr_p860.pdf what does this mean??
Well that’s pretty clear then
> Where are you going live? I want to listen in. They are saying the case was dismissed 30 minutes after Texas filed their response.
@Anacaona His YouTube channel is Uncivil Law.
Scotus denies texas
He's going to read it right now live.
It means legislators can still take action. We can wait on michigan ag to release audit which he is blocking.
@Just A Dad Gamer, you just advanced to level 5!
Now
thank you for going live and sharing your opinion. i don’t have anyone else to talk this stuff through with, so listening to you was helpful!
I assume you meant that for @Uncivil Law I'm not a streamer nor an attorney
woops! yes i did. thx for letting me know!
@x96petersen1, you just advanced to level 3!
@Zuluzeit I agree, a decision so fast seems impossible. I have watched hours of state legislature hearings, how can none of the evidence matter -- this is for our commander in chief.
@Roadtrek Girl Disclosure statement: Almost everything I said about the case was sarcastic. It was a junk idea of a case, filed solely for political theater posturing. The one thing I think would have liked to see was SCOTUS waiting a couple more days, even though everyone knew their decision was a foregone conclusion.
Otherwise, everything I said was facetious. I'm not only liberal, I'm a real bastard too. Just didn't want you to get the wrong impression.
@Uncivil Law glad I watched to the point in your video where you explained why it was a "good" thing the case was dismissed in the long run, makes me feel better.
@Zuluzeit at least you are honest and funny too, I think.
Hahaha thanks...I think.
Been checking this thread for a minute and I just want you to know I appreciate your input. Brings it all together for someone who doesn't have the insight.
funny and honest are good things 🙂
@Uncivil Law, you just advanced to level 5!
What does it mean to have a motion to file a bill of complaint as per the SCOTUS case?
I'm a little confused about the Supreme Court's decision to deny the Texas lawsuit. It seems to me that it was denied, essentially, because Texas has no business in how Pennsylvania (and others) hold their elections. Is this correct? If so, what would be the reasoning for this?
I think Wednesday's show might have been censored
@lapeterson they effectively said that Texashas not suffered an injury that would give them standing to sue.
I think it boils down to they were scared TX would present a good case they would have to agree with.
So the only way to not open that can of worms was to deny it on a technicality.