Message from @Dedkraken
Discord ID: 787180112764338178
This comment by Trump was not concerning Texas case https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1337494507756072961?s=21
What’s your proof
His track record
Wdym
Sorry, it is getting hard to track all of these cases. LOL. I'm checking out for the evening, but I've enjoyed having a real discussion. I still disagree at this point, but I will look at that case.
Wtf is up with that wisdom and courage nonsense?
I swear this lady is smoking kraken rather than releasing one
It wasn’t the case Trump was banking on either
He's making bank but it's not on court cases.
You have the receipts?
These court cases is Trumps best business venture yet 😂
@Dedkraken, you just advanced to level 27!
Cost of all of this litigation?
Ask Robert his best guess on attorneys fees and court costs and costs of investigations
about $7M ... out of over $200M raised
The cost of the litigation is coming from the legal fund
The bulk of the cash is going to the Trump fund
Duh
Ask for an audit
I was wrong $8M ... "According to the most recent FEC report, Trump has spent $8.8 million on legal efforts to overturn the election but has used that effort to raise more than $200 million, sending hundreds of email pitches to donors begging them to contribute to his quest to save the election from being stolen by dastardly Democrats." https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/12/08/whos-going-tell-gop-base-that-theyre-being-scammed/
Where can I donate?
They are different entities
How realistic is the idea that SCOTUS caved to threats of court packing?
I think this is not the case they were waiting to rule on. Has to be right.
You mean how realistic is Trumps claims 24 scotus justices will be added?
Post this once daily
Thanks for the help
I think I've posted this 3 times just today
Good job. Thanks for supporting Trump
Is kinda sad Trump is defrauding poor retirees during a pandemic he wont help with 🤷 💩
be sure to send him double ... because I'm not sending him a dime
No need for you to send. Just keep spreading the word. That’s your part
any time ... folks want to send their hard earned money to a billionaire because they believe said billionaire cares for them and their lives, I'm all for it
Way to support
Texas sued under Article II but SCOTUS rejected it under Article III. As one door shuts, another opens.
What does that mean?
In my opinion I think it means there are more lawsuits coming which are more fine tuned.
I wish SCOTUS hadn't kick it on standing... Some of these cases needed to be heard for merits somewhere. But I think that was the end of it. No one really has standing anywhere. The only thing that can happen now is for the US house of Reps to contest the results, given its current make up getting more than 50% would be a big ask though.
I f&*king hate the 2 party tribalistic system we have... Its stupid. On top of it all the zealots on both sides are F-ing ridiculous. These representatives/senators and such should be a representative of their districts not shills for their party affiliations.