standing as per the constitution: "The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections."
suppose they rule on that narrow issue that extending the deadline past the day of election was unconstitutional according to the US Constitution, then the result is to throw out the votes that arrived after election day, guess what the result would be ... Biden wins PA. Just look on PA website where it says "These vote totals do not include any votes from mail ballots received between 8 p.m. on election day and 5 p.m. the following Friday." https://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/
I'm not sure where you are getting the issue of extending past the day of the election. Obviously I did not read all the briefs, but I have followed this via several sources that oppose each other and I skimmed several of the briefs.
Sorry, it is getting hard to track all of these cases. LOL. I'm checking out for the evening, but I've enjoyed having a real discussion. I still disagree at this point, but I will look at that case.
I was wrong $8M ... "According to the most recent FEC report, Trump has spent $8.8 million on legal efforts to overturn the election but has used that effort to raise more than $200 million, sending hundreds of email pitches to donors begging them to contribute to his quest to save the election from being stolen by dastardly Democrats." https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/12/08/whos-going-tell-gop-base-that-theyre-being-scammed/
