Message from @txgho
Discord ID: 787401738956570647
The Kelly vs. PA case had the win on merit and the improper combo of Latches and Standing killed it.
CCP, fail
We will show CCP that our freedom cannot be sold
Kelly case was fine if they let state congress bait and switch that's not an election.
SCOTUS should have legit sent Kelly back to the State Supreme Court telling them that latches were improperly used to dismiss the case filing a suit 1 day after harm is not what latches was meant for.
It was properly used. They wrote a law for mailin votes. They literally told their party not to use the system. Voters followed all the rules they made to cast their ballot. Then they tried to say whoops our bad we couldnt do that we just going to go ahead and delete a million votes. Nah man how bout you fix that outside an election.
Act 77, was challenged in the courts all the way up to October 28th, 2020. So, 1 week after it was no longer in an active court case and only 1 day after a harm in fact. that seems to me to be poor application of the latches principle. Also, Kelly wasn't challenging the legislation, it was the modifications to the process by the secretary of state and the executive branch that were in direct contradiction to the legislation that was passed that were being challenged. And until the election actually occurred no one had the standing to challenge it. Or that was my understanding from reading the complaints, responses and reply. I am going to say it again I'm not a lawyer so I absolutely could be wrong. I am hear because Robert is one of the few people who can properly explain this BS.
What Kelly claimed was votes done with mailin ballots with no reason violates the state Constitution. This wasnt executive branch modifications or the case tweaking it. Their claim was that the original law as passed contradicted the Constitution. They could have fixed it earlier and they didnt have to wait for the other case to wrap if they are going to try and spike the whole thing. Courts are and should be hesitant to smash the rights of citizens that voted legally following the rules made by law.
But then also when they made the PA Constitution they wanted to protect voters rights from people like Kelly so they also put in text protection from ruling act 77 bad and throwing out a million votes. It says in their Constitution that voters have the right to vote by laws made by PA state congress. So the remedy they wanted breaks the state Constitution. Similarly it says their elections must be free and fair and no power civil or military shall at any time interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage. That part seems to read to me dont screw with voting rules during the election with votes on the line gondola it during normal business hours. No sneaky ninja business.
Attorney: Michigan Vote Flip Happened Due to Computer Program, Not Human Error
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/attorney-michigan-vote-flip-happened-due-to-computer-program-not-human-error_3615410.html
Download our app to read more for free at https://ept.ms/DownloadApp
Ooph epoch times more effective than pearl harbor when it comes to Japanese attacks on our country.
So, Epoch Times is Japanese.
I was under the impression that it was started by dissident Chinese citizens and persecuted practitioners of Falun Gong. @Dedkraken
That is my understanding- dissidents and I believe it is good journalism.
I guess if one is an unwitting proxy for the 50 cent army, all things aligned with CCP are true by default.
Surprise surprise... Facebook fact checks are in part sponsored by byte dance.
No rabbit holes...
@Kitty Lee I just saw that on gateway pundit
Savage Trump came for their money and they came for his lies 🍿
@busillis "Don't go chasing rabbit holes"
Why aren't people as concerned about breaking up Alphabet Inc? Or the likes of Bezos, Musk Gates?
(In response to the Facebook Hype)
Rabbit holes rainbows...
What's the difference...
Double rainbows?
Waterfalls
Windmills
Whatever
Edit: removed irrelevant video for space it consumed.
Cool... Think I've actually seen this...
YouTube video that is
No
What was their decision? When I listened yesterday, the lady justices seemed fairly annoyed at Trumps claims
I haven't had a chance to look into it. Just came across their session.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/election-2020/ct-wisconsin-trump-election-lawsuit-20201212-6bfzlkpt7vamnkrwjagiovkflu-story.html 🤷
@SoonMrWick did you find a decision by Wisconsin Supreme Court? I watched the hearing live but haven’t seen a decision.