that was 2016

"the average swing was 0.2 percentage points"

Yea the better strategy I think is to challenge the extended deadlines and try to nullify the votes that came in after election day (or even after election hours closed)

any idea how many votes that is?

Its not over yet. PA had 3 days NC had 9, etc.

I have a case of Carbernet riding on lawfare drawing out past 15th of january. 😛

Not in malice!

Nullifying votes people cast in good faith on reasonably accepted authority sounds like exactly what this country needs.

Yea not a good look. American's would not be happy with the prospect of possibly invalidating legitimate votes and for good reason. But if you are Trump, it is the better strategy given that these late-coming votes seem to be breaking strongly for Biden.

fair point.

also lets talk about how long it is taking NV so long. Bloomberg says they have counted 82-90% of the votes, but Google is showing only 75% reporting since late last night. why does i seem like they are delaying?

Because those 6 votes are the difference. Trump is taking Pennsylvania, Georgia and N. Carolina. It will be a tremendous comeback victory. A victory like the world has never seen. No one has ever had a victory like his victory.

I think those incoming votes should be compared to the persons previous voting habits. When I have looked into voting fraud before I have found that the ballots that tend to lead to one candidate i.e. Biden are not consistent with all the other candidates i.e. you will see less informed decisions made on other parts of the ballot. I also feel that if a ballot is not completely filled out it should not count it's not hard to just bubble in the rest.

Voter registration is really the countries weak point. They have interstate compacts for child support, driving records, and DV orders if I am not mistaken how hard would it be to create a system for voter registration.

@WatchingYouDaily you have to remember that to the left, voter registration=voter suppression

> @WatchingYouDaily you have to remember that to the left, voter registration=voter suppression
@TheParamedicGamer The reverse to that is voter registration and validations = Voter integrity.

https://twitter.com/willchamberlain/status/1324356921852387328?s=21

I agree that any random person who wants to birddog the process should just show up and walk in, especially if they have an agenda. If we really think that through, what could go wrong?

You mean these are just random cityzens who show up to check the voting on their own agenda?

The lady in the video above comes forth as rather mature with low Karen-factor, doesnt she?

> @TheParamedicGamer The reverse to that is voter registration and validations = Voter integrity.
@WatchingYouDaily fair but the left will still call it what they have been calling it for years.

I think what he meant by that their agenda or goal is to validate the process to make sure they are not bringing in ballots

and the reason for that is because what what was going in during Jim Crow when it was specifically used as voter suppression

I don't think that a portion of the votes were done in good faith as shown by Veritas and others.

I don't think the 100,000 dump all for biden and the 135,000 dump with only 5,000 for trump were in good faith either.

But as you say, it's not a good look and will lead to more division and most likely continued riots.

Facts don't always matter and especially if the communication is controlled by the opposition

Agendas are the natural enemies of facts.

Sorry for my lack of understanding of the election system, but how will they conduct a recount in places like Michigan where USPS workers were supposedly advised to bring in ballots on November 4th and stamp them with November 3rd? How will they distinguish between these fraudulent ballots and the valid ballots?

yeah. and while i would like to take what Veritas has done. my issue with them is that they have an extremely obvious lean

@daddy Kevin fair question

@Michele411 Those 'dumps' were fake news.

or that is metafake news

https://twitter.com/fleccas/status/1324216584219623424?s=19

Shouldn't it be easy to not let desd people vote?

I wonder who he voted for.

> https://twitter.com/fleccas/status/1324216584219623424?s=19
@Elias Diaz Agreed the home I own was sold to me by the owners brother in 2016 because his sister died. A new registration showed up for her and a ballot. I reported the information to my board of elections and the county in question along with the other 7 dead people. Three of those were medical calls in my jurisdiction where they were pronounced dead in my presence the other 4 in the presence of someone I personally know in EMS or at one of the local hospitals that day.

> yeah. and while i would like to take what Veritas has done. my issue with them is that they have an extremely obvious lean
@TheParamedicGamer

I believe that Veritas has won all defamation suits and has a wall of retractions, they use video of actual whistleblowers and people speaking about their own actions. I don't really care which way someone leans the if I believe that they are being factual.

I wish Assange were free especially now. If I were trump I would regret listening to the intelligence creeps and not pardoning him.

If trump did want to drain the swamp he definitely listened to the wrong people.

Voter fraud not only has to be attempted (which is not established) but also has to work, in order for it to be a problem. All I'm seeing is that desperation doesn't seem to make people *less* credulous. Quite the opposite, as should be expected.

> Voter fraud not only has to be attempted (which is not established) but also has to work, in order for it to be a problem. All I'm seeing is that desperation doesn't seem to make people *less* credulous. Quite the opposite, as should be expected.
@Zuluzeit I am a victim of voter fraud. Someone was able to get a voter registration in my name in another county in my state in a county I never lived in right before our primary and submitted a ballot. I had to fight it

There have been rumors flying around about postal workers receiving a "directive" (from whom?) that they are to round up every ballot that they can find (in mailboxes, collection boxes, etc) , sort them to a special bin, collect them in express mail bags, and stamp them with Nov 3rd postmarks

The county that allowed it never validated it with the state system or my county board of elections

but

who knows the validity of this