Message from @Zuluzeit

Discord ID: 774092098055569429


2020-11-06 01:46:37 UTC  

@Zuluzeit 100% biden votes mail-in ballots is a statistical impossibility. We are not "undermining" them. We want a fair election with legal votes, which these one's clearly aren't.

2020-11-06 01:47:14 UTC  

@Zuluzeit it’s disingenuous to say that the vote by mail was undermined. What was undermined was the makeshift vote by mail programs Democrats implemented under the guise of health concerns because it gave them at best, a larger voting base, and at worst a chance for election fraud. My state has had vote by mail for a long time and no Republican objected.

2020-11-06 01:47:45 UTC  

@Nick Corona I agree. I also think that anyone perpetrating fraud also agrees. That's why I think it's fake news.

2020-11-06 01:51:06 UTC  

@Gypsy_Warlord You are certainly welcome to believe it's a scam. I disagree.

2020-11-06 01:51:26 UTC  

There have been several disasters with mail in over the past year (see: Patterson NJ) which really didn't do is any favors. I think it's just the infrastructure wasn't set up properly for many states

2020-11-06 01:52:13 UTC  

Dead people, cats, people who no longer reside in a state getting ballots. It just does not look good no matter which way the votes go

2020-11-06 01:53:03 UTC  

@Zuluzeit it’s fraud, I don’t think the people who committed the fraud believed they were acting unethically. I have heard many Democrats say that removing trump from office should be done at all cost. I just never knew everyone in this country was so soft. I am probably just used to personalities who say alienating things 😂

2020-11-06 01:55:31 UTC  

If they were rigging it, they did a really bad and incomplete job.

2020-11-06 01:58:00 UTC  

another whistleblower from USPS

2020-11-06 01:58:33 UTC  

saying that his supervisor is ordering ballots be postmarked with november 3rd

2020-11-06 01:58:41 UTC  

he said they're picking up more ballots tomorrow

2020-11-06 01:59:07 UTC  

no evidence of election fraud you say?

2020-11-06 02:04:21 UTC  

It would have to come from an authority, not an anecdotal fire hose of people just saying stuff. People say a lot of things. I could make a video right now claiming anything for either side, post it on twitter and both would be accepted, based on whose narrative it suits. My standards of evidence are higher than that. Put it in a court room and I'll watch. Otherwise, sorry.

2020-11-06 02:04:54 UTC  

it's not anecdotal

2020-11-06 02:05:03 UTC  

he works for the postal office

2020-11-06 02:05:06 UTC  

he's a witness

2020-11-06 02:05:16 UTC  

you don't have standards, you have your head in the sand

2020-11-06 02:05:38 UTC  

When it goes to court, I'll listen.

2020-11-06 02:05:50 UTC  

Same. Show me the affidavit

2020-11-06 02:07:02 UTC  

Lol, if it's a youtube video, you'll just deny it, but if it's that same youtube video in court

2020-11-06 02:07:04 UTC  

then you'll listen

2020-11-06 02:07:05 UTC  

gotcha

2020-11-06 02:07:22 UTC  

Correct. Exactly.

2020-11-06 02:07:34 UTC  

that's called willful ignorance

2020-11-06 02:07:48 UTC  

this is anecdotal

2020-11-06 02:07:56 UTC  

it is worrying enough to cause an investigation

2020-11-06 02:08:00 UTC  

not to reach a conclusion

2020-11-06 02:08:06 UTC  

Agree

2020-11-06 02:08:07 UTC  

(IMO)

2020-11-06 02:09:17 UTC  

So it’s probable cause but not a beyond a reasonable doubt. I can get behind that.

2020-11-06 02:13:04 UTC  

Because I don't think people typically commit perjury

2020-11-06 02:14:15 UTC  

When they say it under oath then I'm more willing to listen

2020-11-06 02:14:50 UTC  

@Elzam you have met a lot more ethical people than I have in this universe 😂

2020-11-06 02:17:14 UTC  

lol, based on nothing at all.

2020-11-06 02:17:26 UTC  

it's almost as if just saying it makes it true