Message from @leftingfighter33
Discord ID: 774923259758116874
Battery tech
i was headed to a show in georgia, and saw my first large scale solar project in person. i was disgusted.
That doesn't mean we can't use it. Plus that's not entirely true.
We need to get out of here. They're posting election stuff.
general chat?
The problem is that a home's demand for electricity does not necessarily occur at the same time that the sun is out. Homes, of course, need power at night and on cloudy days. Solar systems feed excess power back into the electric grid, which allows homes to draw from the grid when the sun isn't shining, but that still entails a reliance on fossil fuels. (One way to mitigate that would be for governments to build significantly more nuclear power stations, but they have been increasingly reluctant to do so in the wake of the nuclear accident in Fukushima.)
The ideal solution is a big battery that can store at least a day's worth of electricity, if not more for the winter months in colder climates. Such batteries already exist. For example, Tesla uses 60 kWh and 85 kWh batteries in its cars, enough for up to 300 miles of driving, and two to three days of power for an average U.S. household.
The trouble is that each kW of storage carries a whopping price tag of $600 for consumers. Adding a 60 kWh battery to a household solar system would tack on $36,000 to the total cost, lifting the price of 20 years of solar power to at least $47,000. That's way too much — especially considering that the battery could need to be replaced long before a solar panel's 20-year lifespan is up.
Yes, that doesn't render it useless. It's not either-or. It's an amalgamation.
Trump will win
Lol there done
The software glitch that swaped votes was an operation
People will go to jail
Doubt it. Any source on that
Glitch will just be a mechanical failure and no one will be blamed for it without proving intent
@leftingfighter33 i wish that were true. But dont see any evidence
> @leftingfighter33 i wish that were true. But dont see any evidence
@Elias Diaz evidence for it being an operation? Or for it happening
I don't see any evidence that it was planned or intentional. We have just heard about one glitch that happened.
> I don't see any evidence that it was planned or intentional. We have just heard about one glitch that happened.
@Elias Diaz I think it was very much intentional. You don't write a bug into your software tha randomly swaps votes.
It isn't just "one glitch", the executable for the software comes from the source code. All executables that are the same version were compiled down to binary from the same source code and have the same glitch.
This is literally one of the simplest pieces of software to write and you're going to tell me some dumb dev just swaped two arrays by mistake? No that doesn't happen.
If the same software was used in multiple places then they should do a re-count by hand in all of the places.
I work in a very sensitive field and if a mistake like this happened somebody is getting fired and heads are rolling, we would have to report it to the FDA and there would be accountability. An entire investigation would be open and a root cause analysis would be done.
A CAPA would be open detailing the corrective action that was taken and everything would be recorded. If the medical field can do this why the hell are our elections a free for all? When they are just as important?
@leftingfighter33 i wish that were true. And maybe after additional investigation it is determined that something like what you described is true.
But I believe they mentioned that the glitch was actually a clerical error
But maybe im wrong? I just want them to do an investigation and confirm that there isnt any funny business going on and i can have a little (only a little) faith in the system
from what I read it was just the live vote counting software
not official vote counts
`unofficial results`
Short version, just specific anomalous data
I suspect all the counties that use Clearvote and Dominion software or machines are being recounted and supervised by the National Guard from people I know in my state responsible for installation and updating.
> I suspect all the counties that use Clearvote and Dominion software or machines are being recounted and supervised by the National Guard from people I know in my state responsible for installation and updating.
@WatchingYouDaily nice
@realz They left my county board of elections Friday.
> But maybe im wrong? I just want them to do an investigation and confirm that there isnt any funny business going on and i can have a little (only a little) faith in the system
@Elias Diaz Your not wrong because the clerks are not suppose to be doing any software updating.
Here's something I heard the other day about these lawsuits; what if Trump and his legal team don't pursue voter fraud as intensely as we've seen, but instead shift direction to voter impropriety? Attempt to prove that the accuracy of votes counted is in question due to the change in state laws prior to this election.
Think that will be easier to prove or be easier to legally pursue?
What would be the remedy?
I would assume the remedy would be votes received after election day either don't count or must be separated in the future, and there must be clear, concise, and reasonable procedure sin place for observers/watchers.
I came across an argument made on FB that I'll share here when I find it. Sites federal law too. Wait one.
Crypto voting and open-source counting.
"What is your assessment of this analysis?👇🏻
This is NOT a “voter fraud” issue as much as it is a “voting fraud” issue perpetuated by Democrat-controlled states to circumvent the requirements of USC 3 Sec 1 - Appointing Electors.
USC 3 Sec 1 requires Electors to be appointed ON Election Day. For Electors to be appointed ON Election Day, votes must be RECEIVED (NOT MERELY POSTMARKED) BY Election Day.
This is codified in FEDERAL LAW!
USC 3 Sec 2 provides that a State which has HELD such an election (for the appointment of Electors ON Election Day) can subsequently count votes that are RECEIVED (not merely postmarked) BY Election Day if they cannot count them on Election Day.
The states have the prerogative to run their own elections (procedural issue) and have their citizens waste their votes by allowing votes to be POSTMARKED BY Election Day - but the only ones that count (substantive issue) are the ones RECEIVED BY Election Day!
The State can run its elections procedurally however it likes as long as it does not conflict with the federal requirement that Electors be appointed ON Election Day.
Classic Federalism /Federal Preemption.
There is no articulable way that an Elector can be appointed ON Election Day on the basis of votes RECEIVED AFTER Election Day.
NET RESULT:
Any votes RECEIVED after the polls close on Election Day are NOT COMPLIANT for the purpose of appointing Electors under FEDERAL LAW (USC 3 SEC 1) EVEN IF the they are’s compliant under applicable STATE LAW - REGARDLESS of whether the State Legislature legislatively extended the deadline or not.
Disqualify ALL mail-in ballots received AFTER Election Day - (1) regardless of its postmark date and (2) regardless of whether the State Legislatire extended the deadline or not.
Either one is violative of the governing FEDERAL statute (USC 3 Sec 1) regarding the appointment of Electors for the purpose of electing the President of the United States."