Message from @leftingfighter33
Discord ID: 775546949445222450
Is this a debate or are you discussing this like I am?just curious?
Looks like all the characteristics of a discussion to me.
Im CALMLY waiting and discussing it lol.Not interested in going down that road until Im comfortable here.
just asking
it is whatever you prefer 🙂
I was discussing,as I said.Not becouse there is a lack of proof but becouse its to early to be having this DEBATE.
That seems to have been her point.
@DrSammyD I see, so it is counting the popular vote of all eligible (or even non-eligible) voters, while the popular vote is only voters
Id think None eligable voters shouldnt count.
Thats why it is so important to get this done now before they can just get rid of the ballots
or do a re election
Idk man. There are a lot of numerology-like contortions going around. There is a pile of smart people out there on both sides. One would have to know what the other would see, in order to be sophisticated enough to pull off a caper like this. That's just my intuition.
The census goes towards house rep, so how ever the census counts people
I might have missed it, but did Robert read he affidavit?
he reads through part of it
apparently the USPS union basically threatened him implicitly
which is why he went public with his identity
Rob went through it. That guy had better hope he properly understood what was being directed and wasn't just looking for malfeasance where it didn't exist.
can I ask a question? How come its FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD when Joe Biden wins states he was predicted to win but closer than expected but nobody has brought up FRAUD when it comes to the Senate races that were predicted democratic pickups but the republicans won?
it seems that there might be bias in the people claiming fraud
It's called confirmation bias. Count the hits but not the misses.
thats what it seems like to me. I like the result? Everything is fine. I don't like the result? WELL SOMETHING MUST BE WRONG
How is it Bias only one way?If this was biden that was claiming that with the odditys that are happening wouldnt you want it properly investigated?
Have there been the same oddities with the senate races? Like the spikes in votes for Republican politicians? Or democrats not being allowed to review ballots? @NidoGod
No one is suggesting things shouldn't be investigated. The suggestion is that, with the scores of claims that have already turned out to be perfectly normal course, it might be a good idea to temper wishful thinking, lest the result render the anxiety unnecessary and the truth palatable.
Republicans arent being allowed
I could be wrong but i don't see the those things applied against dems. But i havent searched into it much. Would genuinely like to know @NidoGod
Not letting in angry hordes with an agenda is not the same thing as banning observers. There are legally appointed observers from both sides present. They thought of that.
I dont see anyone doing that tho...I see americans standing up against a foul media that are doing awful things to MOSTLY conservatives,Biden CLAIMING he has already won when just a weak or so aho they were saying things like "Oh it will take months to deal with the election" now there like "just accept it".There IS evidence out there to support something happened.They have already determined this with the dominion systems "Glitch" so it hasnt all been debunked.Its crazy how someone can say that given no one is disputing the dominion systems "Glitch" That system is in many other countrys and MANY other states.
It's probably a good idea to control access to venues containing live ballots, particularly when people are upset. That's all I'm saying.
That isnt how it started at all!They were legal OBSERVERS.The court ordered dems to let them in and they flat out said no,so did the sherif.He broke the law.Sorry but thats ILEGAL.
Control them against officials?
That makes no sense
If someone refused access to a legal observer who was following the covenants to which they agreed, anyone who did it would be in jail as we speak.
Just so...but apparently the sherif disagree's with you...wich is wy the judge is forcing it.Altho if they make them wait long enough the proof will be gone.You prolly already know all of this tho,Most of what Im seeing from you are denials.
No insult...just reread
All of these theories rely on the absence of process controls that actually exist and we wouldn't even have thought up. It's not set up as simply as if you or I designed it.
ok,you dont agree that the law was broken...I mean the judge does so I guess we will see.What about the dominion systems "Glitch"?isnt that reason enough for there to be an investigation?