Message from @Reaper294
Discord ID: 775557092232265740
it shouldnt...ok so what is a reason to break the law then?
to impede a vote perhaps?
lmao
yes it is...it was over the election..wow.I see what your doing but to me its just slow denial and bias.Maybe Im wrong but Im sure if the shoe was on the other foot you would care.Obviously you dont now tho so...Have fun with the chat.
You asked a general question. I made sure you knew that I recognized that. Ask me a specific one about this case and I'll say I don't know.
Its the LAW to follow a court order UNTIL its "smacked down" like you said
That's not up to you, chief.
it isnt?
I say it is
If the law isnt being followed to a high order who's job is it to right it?
Let's say they pass a law to take your guns away...and there is a court order specific to you. Will you give them up? Will you just 'roll over'? Think it through. I'll wait.
Ill give them up if there is a court order,then contest it until I legally deal with it.However if its unlawfull then hell no I wont
Thats the proper answer
Precisely my point. We're done here.
i will go on a "fishing trip" and lose them oh wait i live in nyc and am a minor so i dont have any
huh?you made no point but you can walk away.That was hilarious!
you just tried turning the whole conversating around.I asked you if they should follow a legal order.You said no I said yes,,,the answer should be yes.lmao.Im very confused to your logic.
You not understanding a point has no bearing on it. Continuing to run around the track doesn't make the race still on.
lol @spacefan247 exactly
Lol ok you win. Congrats!
Dude saying things you think are inteligent dosnt make it so.
😆
👍
Court orders must be immutably obeyed, unless you feel they are unlawful:
"Ill give them up if there is a court order,then contest it until I legally deal with it.However if its unlawfull then hell no I wont"
It wasn't even difficult.
It wasnt illegal...ok please explain then sir.
Im pretty sure my answer was sufficient.
Oh,If I felt they were unlawful?
well,they would have to first be unlawful...why do you think a judges order was unlawful?
If his order was unlawful then it should have been followed UNTIL proven it was unlawful correct?
I don't think that. I never said I did. People could have a lot of reasons to reject it. I don't know that they are even disobeying, much less the reason, if they were. Neither do you.
lmao...it was a judges ORDER!Im very confused now.Is a judges order supposed to be followed in america?
Was the voter fraud initated by biden himself ✅ or just partisan individuals? ❌
We've been over this. I make no claims about what they're doing or why they're doing it. I'm certainly not in a position to infer fraud from it either. I'm more interested in how you cannot recognize the contradiction regarding your staunch non-rollover policy when juxtaposed with your response to an actual example using the very concept you put forth immediately before the example was given.
How did I differ on my answer oh enlightened one?
Call me what you like. You said court orders must be obeyed blindly. Then you said if you personally determine that it's unlawful, you won't obey. Pick a lane, bro.
Retract that part of your statement as just locker room talk and you're whole again.
Nevermind.Iv had conversations with types like you before.You think your being all intelectual and you arent.I made valid points and you just avoided the answer or tried to roll it off.My point was made.Agree or disagree and try to convince others of your inteligence I really dont care.LMAO,Id rather debate someone with ACTUAL inteligence and an argument then a defeatism attitude and nonsenically un inteligent responses.I mean no offence but all your doing is trying to muddle the convo.Its fairly childish honestly.My kids have done the samething to not go to bed lmao.
I didnt say personally did I?
please repost my response oh enlightened one lol.