No you just tried denying proof a second ago and said other people with more of a stake could decide,lol.Are you thinking what your saying thru?

look

Not getting hyper about it at the first available moment before I am convinced is not defeatism.

Would you agree that a court order should be followed no matter what?

No and that is not a claim about the current situation.

it shouldnt...ok so what is a reason to break the law then?

to impede a vote perhaps?

lmao

yes it is...it was over the election..wow.I see what your doing but to me its just slow denial and bias.Maybe Im wrong but Im sure if the shoe was on the other foot you would care.Obviously you dont now tho so...Have fun with the chat.

You asked a general question. I made sure you knew that I recognized that. Ask me a specific one about this case and I'll say I don't know.

Its the LAW to follow a court order UNTIL its "smacked down" like you said

That's not up to you, chief.

it isnt?

I say it is

If the law isnt being followed to a high order who's job is it to right it?

Let's say they pass a law to take your guns away...and there is a court order specific to you. Will you give them up? Will you just 'roll over'? Think it through. I'll wait.

Ill give them up if there is a court order,then contest it until I legally deal with it.However if its unlawfull then hell no I wont

Thats the proper answer

Precisely my point. We're done here.

i will go on a "fishing trip" and lose them oh wait i live in nyc and am a minor so i dont have any

huh?you made no point but you can walk away.That was hilarious!

you just tried turning the whole conversating around.I asked you if they should follow a legal order.You said no I said yes,,,the answer should be yes.lmao.Im very confused to your logic.

You not understanding a point has no bearing on it. Continuing to run around the track doesn't make the race still on.

lol @spacefan247 exactly

wow...still your trying.You look pretty silly.Like I said defeatism

Lol ok you win. Congrats!

Dude saying things you think are inteligent dosnt make it so.

😆

👍

Court orders must be immutably obeyed, unless you feel they are unlawful:

"Ill give them up if there is a court order,then contest it until I legally deal with it.However if its unlawfull then hell no I wont"

It wasn't even difficult.

It wasnt illegal...ok please explain then sir.

Im pretty sure my answer was sufficient.

Oh,If I felt they were unlawful?

well,they would have to first be unlawful...why do you think a judges order was unlawful?

If his order was unlawful then it should have been followed UNTIL proven it was unlawful correct?

I don't think that. I never said I did. People could have a lot of reasons to reject it. I don't know that they are even disobeying, much less the reason, if they were. Neither do you.

lmao...it was a judges ORDER!Im very confused now.Is a judges order supposed to be followed in america?

Was the voter fraud initated by biden himself ✅ or just partisan individuals? ❌

We've been over this. I make no claims about what they're doing or why they're doing it. I'm certainly not in a position to infer fraud from it either. I'm more interested in how you cannot recognize the contradiction regarding your staunch non-rollover policy when juxtaposed with your response to an actual example using the very concept you put forth immediately before the example was given.

How did I differ on my answer oh enlightened one?