Message from @meglide

Discord ID: 776583547107934239


2020-11-12 20:08:57 UTC  

The purpose is to display the % of straight party tickets, and the % of split tickets, and then display the % each candidate got of split tickets as a function of the % they got of straight tickets.

2020-11-12 20:09:19 UTC  

Let me know if you see an error in my math

2020-11-12 20:11:05 UTC  

@DrSammyD so a downslope indicates that the more heavily partisan a county is, the more likely it is to vote a split ticket?

2020-11-12 20:11:21 UTC  

seems counterintuitive

2020-11-12 20:19:12 UTC  

No, the more heavily partisan a county is, the more likely the split voter is to vote for the opposite President

2020-11-12 20:20:20 UTC  

Here's a csv of the equations. https://json-csv.com/c/aiXI

2020-11-12 20:21:43 UTC  

Thanks, any chance of state column?

2020-11-12 20:22:02 UTC  

It'll be in alphabetical order

2020-11-12 20:22:23 UTC  

By abbreviation?

2020-11-12 20:22:32 UTC  

Yes

2020-11-12 20:23:02 UTC  

Make sure you download the new link I just edited (I had the candidates reversed)

2020-11-12 20:30:41 UTC  

The problem as I see it is that the split voter in Michigan is implausibly more likely to vote Biden than in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and even Illinois

2020-11-12 20:31:38 UTC  

Like 2X

2020-11-12 20:38:38 UTC  

Also, not that this is the theoretical maximum of straight party tickets.

2020-11-12 20:49:14 UTC  

Hmm, I just updated the data to assume a 10% of the theoretical maximum straight tickets are actually split tickets, which overlap on the party candidate with the least votes

2020-11-12 21:03:49 UTC  

I'm seeing other issues with the slope equations, such as " Equation = y = -7.05x + 232.32" for Trump GA in the csv, but "-.16x + 2.62" in graphic.

2020-11-12 21:06:06 UTC  

Hmmm, ok

2020-11-12 21:06:19 UTC  

Let me see if I can generate it better

2020-11-12 21:14:38 UTC  
2020-11-12 23:05:45 UTC  

> @meglide I think the courts should address all of it whether it changes the outcome or not...it is possible that the 3rd party candidates had votes taken from them as well due to these glitches and if everyone just focuses on the 2 parties, they will miss those votes, which could potentially still swing the election in favor of one of the 2 party candidates. For instance in PA, about 50-60k jorgensen votes were given to Biden due to an error from their names being mistaken for the other...if this was fraudulent, and they should go back to Jorgensen, then this is enough to put Trump ahead even if his votes weren't part of the transaction.
@Winter personally I think they should also but that's not what I've been told the courts do ... if there is evidence of a crime they may certainly prosecute that person but remedies for procedural mistakes may not happen ... that said, see my post, PA court ruled deadline extension lacked authority and those ballots may not be counted.

2020-11-12 23:12:03 UTC  

> No, the more heavily partisan a county is, the more likely the split voter is to vote for the opposite President
@DrSammyD agreed ... just like everyone hates Congress but likes their members of Congress 🙄

2020-11-12 23:15:55 UTC  

> The problem as I see it is that the split voter in Michigan is implausibly more likely to vote Biden than in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and even Illinois
@DrSammyD not so sure of that, doesn't MI have a Republican dominated state legislature and a Democratic governor? seems like the perfect place to get that kind of split?

2020-11-12 23:27:30 UTC  

Maybe this was covered here already or in one of the videos (link if there is one), but do you think Trump has a solid case under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment?

2020-11-12 23:41:47 UTC  

> @DrSammyD not so sure of that, doesn't MI have a Republican dominated state legislature and a Democratic governor? seems like the perfect place to get that kind of split?
@meglide
So does Wisconsin and Minnesota.

2020-11-12 23:42:34 UTC  

@DrSammyD didn't know that ... interesting

2020-11-12 23:43:53 UTC  

Minnesota's senate is Republican, not their house.

2020-11-12 23:44:05 UTC  

But Wisconsin is almost the same make up

2020-11-12 23:47:25 UTC  

> I'm seeing other issues with the slope equations, such as " Equation = y = -7.05x + 232.32" for Trump GA in the csv, but "-.16x + 2.62" in graphic.
@stevesirag looking at that I am suspicious of a machine manipulation

2020-11-13 00:22:01 UTC  

what sort of company - involved in selections no less - decides to have an evil sounding name like "Dominion"

2020-11-13 00:22:08 UTC  

QED

2020-11-13 00:25:47 UTC  

@meglide @stevesirag @DrSammyD I am curious what this sort of analysis looks like on the 2012, 2016 elections

2020-11-13 00:26:16 UTC  

it isn't a perfect comparison, but if such anomalies show up regularly, it can mean we can set this sort of proof aside

2020-11-13 00:26:26 UTC  

@RobertGrulerEsq @FaithJoy In the 9 counties of Washington state that have their ballot status CSV's posted I have found 3932 ballots cast here with an Arizona address that could have voted there. I turned over all the data from my state to the Trump investigative team just in case the people are not filling out the change of address forms.

2020-11-13 00:28:11 UTC  

(I'm 11 mins behind) these slides are sometimes very nice; I am particularly interested in the Types of Fraud Allegation slides, are they available anywhere?

2020-11-13 00:28:18 UTC  

guess I can just take a screenie

2020-11-13 00:31:00 UTC  

nice slides!

2020-11-13 00:31:30 UTC  

(I'm posting screenies in another discord or two)

2020-11-13 00:38:57 UTC  

@realz we can probably start posting the slides in a separate channel on here! ill ask rob after the show(: but dont see why not!

2020-11-13 00:48:56 UTC  

Philadelphia has CRAZY independent leaning toward Biden