Message from @leftingfighter33
Discord ID: 776931739092254740
This may not be proof, but it sure is evidence...
https://thespectator.info/2020/11/13/i-know-in-venezuela-elections-are-like-this-it-was-stolen/
a more direct link instead of a copypasta name-stealing story mill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pmv1DIDQhkI and the video
for some reason the bitchute video is gone
someone back up the video 😛
trump is talking i guess?
his hair is white
I also heard him condition his future COVID policy on who is president
which is important for all those who think he is trying to make a coup
I think the biggest news is the hair
I have a hard time believing that there was a coordinated effort between ALL of the poll workers and democratic observers to illegally take an election. That many people would have secondary and tertiary people and loads of physical evidence. But all that is really presented is a couple of witnesses with allegedly factual accounts.
anyway, I gotta run
Poll workers wouldn't have to be fully in on it. They'd be told something like "new ballots found, count these". That combined with a incurious media and general disfavor to the President is enough to maintain silence.
And there are thousands of people reporting similar things, and hundreds of sworn statements. Again not proof yet, but evidence.
As you said there is a general disfavor. I can tell you that I only voted blue at the top of the ballot.
General disfavor among the volunteers at these big city counting centers. It's notable that the reports came from these places in which the mysterious tranches appeared. IE there wasn't poll watcher harassment, mysterious hiatuses in counting, etc in St Louis.
Looks like the AP called N. Carolina
The larger point is that when you open holes in your election security large enough to drive a truck through you know a truck is coming. Far from undermining democracy, examining and discussing these issues builds our understanding of what a secure election looks like. I spent time in emerging democracies, and this work is critical.
Wisconsin Elections Commission admits to breaking Wisconsin Election Law.
@RobertGrulerEsq Is this a correct interpretation of the law? Have you seen this?
Wait. It says "may not be counted". Does it need to say "shall not be counted"?
May is discretionary, shall is mandatory
Question would be if the law provides any guidance on the discretionary part
I see. This is the law in case your interested in it. I'm looking over for guidance. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/6/IV/87
> @meglide
>
> ... Not that we have the hard proof of this...
@stevesirag yeah that's the deal isn't it
Yet
We do have evidence
> We do have evidence
@stevesirag then bring it before and see if it is sufficient to get a favorable court ruling on it ... my guess is that it is not
before a court that is
Don't need to. Just need enough to convince the state legislature.
You can count on them to do what's popular in their state
> You can count on them to do what's popular in their state
@DrSammyD which will translate into letting the popular vote of their state stand absent of substantial election fraud
Maybe, maybe not.
Depends on what's shown in court. If it's just shy of rising to the level of a court injunction, it might just be that the state legislatures find it convincing enough to appoint different delegates
I don't see too many of these guys getting thrown out for distrusting the counts in the Cities. Hell, it'd probably secure their future victory.
interesting ... in GA about 46k voted for Pres that did NOT vote in the Senate race and Biden got about 100k more votes than the Dem candidate for Senate .... margin of "victory" for Biden over Trump about 14k
That could just be dems voting straight ticket and GOP not