We do have evidence

> We do have evidence
@stevesirag then bring it before and see if it is sufficient to get a favorable court ruling on it ... my guess is that it is not

before a court that is

Don't need to. Just need enough to convince the state legislature.

You can count on them to do what's popular in their state

> You can count on them to do what's popular in their state
@DrSammyD which will translate into letting the popular vote of their state stand absent of substantial election fraud

Maybe, maybe not.

Depends on what's shown in court. If it's just shy of rising to the level of a court injunction, it might just be that the state legislatures find it convincing enough to appoint different delegates

I don't see too many of these guys getting thrown out for distrusting the counts in the Cities. Hell, it'd probably secure their future victory.

interesting ... in GA about 46k voted for Pres that did NOT vote in the Senate race and Biden got about 100k more votes than the Dem candidate for Senate .... margin of "victory" for Biden over Trump about 14k

That could just be dems voting straight ticket and GOP not

> That could just be dems voting straight ticket and GOP not
@Elzam nope that total count includes 3rd party candidates on the ballot

total votes for Pres (all candidates) minus total votes for Sen (all candidates) = 46k

OK so 46k democrats voted for Biden and no one else

And some number of republicans voted for Biden + GOP seats

keep looking at the numbers ... not exactly what you just said

https://bitcadia.github.io/DownBallot/Outputs/StraightIndividualRatioCompare.html?First=GA&Second=2

almost every vote for Rep Sen was also vote for Trump

It still doesn't account for any number of ballots with just Biden

you're catching on

difference between Trump and Biden is only 14k

Ballots with just a presidential candidate happen in the order of 100k every year

In every state

It's not suspicious

Unless you want to go back and say they're suspicious every time it's done, which, OK go for it

> It's not suspicious
@Elzam not saying it is just saying it is interesting

How can it be interesting if it happens every election?

I'm trying to discern what the Sen runoff will be like

I see

also if the Rep gets just 50 percent or over then no runoff

this Rep stands at 49.71 percent

why no pres runoff in GA?

because Pres is determined by federal election law and Sen is state election law

ah

well actually it's more complicated ...

the US Constitution allows for the state legislature to pick the method to determine the electors BUT the Constitution also sets the dates so there's no time for a runoff prior to certifying and selecting electors

but they can have their Sen runoff in Jan and still have Sen ready to be sworn in for the next Congress

okay it's federal election law as voted by US Congress for the dates as per the Constitution to be very picky but you get idea

okay back to the GA Sen race ... there's like 86k vote advantage for the Rep with 114k voting for the Libertarian candidate ... Dem candidate would have to take 3 out of 4 of every Libertarian voter just to even to total ... my belief is that a Libertarian voter will want gridlock in DC if they can't have their candidate and will break heavy Rep also there's at least 46k that voted in Pres race that didn't vote for Rep Sen but are all of those going to come out for the Sen race AND vote Dem?

and all the Rep have to do is get ONE GA Sen seat to ensure 51 seat majority ... Dems have to get BOTH to get a 50/50 tie with VP Harris being the tie-breaker

and then there is Manchin from West "by God" Virginia ... an old-time Democrat that ain't for "crazy socialist agenda" <insert AOC stare here>