Message from @meglide
Discord ID: 776987057896816710
I see. This is the law in case your interested in it. I'm looking over for guidance. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/6/IV/87
> @meglide
>
> ... Not that we have the hard proof of this...
@stevesirag yeah that's the deal isn't it
Yet
We do have evidence
> We do have evidence
@stevesirag then bring it before and see if it is sufficient to get a favorable court ruling on it ... my guess is that it is not
before a court that is
Don't need to. Just need enough to convince the state legislature.
You can count on them to do what's popular in their state
> You can count on them to do what's popular in their state
@DrSammyD which will translate into letting the popular vote of their state stand absent of substantial election fraud
Maybe, maybe not.
Depends on what's shown in court. If it's just shy of rising to the level of a court injunction, it might just be that the state legislatures find it convincing enough to appoint different delegates
I don't see too many of these guys getting thrown out for distrusting the counts in the Cities. Hell, it'd probably secure their future victory.
interesting ... in GA about 46k voted for Pres that did NOT vote in the Senate race and Biden got about 100k more votes than the Dem candidate for Senate .... margin of "victory" for Biden over Trump about 14k
That could just be dems voting straight ticket and GOP not
> That could just be dems voting straight ticket and GOP not
@Elzam nope that total count includes 3rd party candidates on the ballot
total votes for Pres (all candidates) minus total votes for Sen (all candidates) = 46k
OK so 46k democrats voted for Biden and no one else
And some number of republicans voted for Biden + GOP seats
keep looking at the numbers ... not exactly what you just said
It still doesn't account for any number of ballots with just Biden
you're catching on
difference between Trump and Biden is only 14k
Ballots with just a presidential candidate happen in the order of 100k every year
In every state
It's not suspicious
Unless you want to go back and say they're suspicious every time it's done, which, OK go for it
> It's not suspicious
@Elzam not saying it is just saying it is interesting
How can it be interesting if it happens every election?
I'm trying to discern what the Sen runoff will be like
I see
also if the Rep gets just 50 percent or over then no runoff
this Rep stands at 49.71 percent
why no pres runoff in GA?
because Pres is determined by federal election law and Sen is state election law
ah
well actually it's more complicated ...
the US Constitution allows for the state legislature to pick the method to determine the electors BUT the Constitution also sets the dates so there's no time for a runoff prior to certifying and selecting electors
but they can have their Sen runoff in Jan and still have Sen ready to be sworn in for the next Congress
okay it's federal election law as voted by US Congress for the dates as per the Constitution to be very picky but you get idea