Message from @TaLoN132
Discord ID: 779589846255534080
this is from new york times feed - you can see the swaps in here too
Have you seen the code for dominion vote switching jack on githib?
Github.
It is being hosted on there right out in the open
No I haven't, do you have a link?
I will look it up
I didnt check it out, for obvious reasons. Might be a bad idea to link it. Just I. Case its legit
Ahh, what did you goole?
Yeah. One sec
In Philly a master keycard & laptop disappeared from supervisor of election office
Dominion keycard
@NoobDad I'm a software architect and engineer. I've worked in virtually every modern development environment, but my specialty is highly scalable database systems.
@TaLoN132 Nice, I'm aspiring architect and full stack developer. The architecture Russell explains seems legitimate, it's a half-cocked solutions that you usually see with customers
I still don't know how vote switching in software could overcome a full hand recount - given that the voting machines printed out a paper ballot.
the voting machines could print a different option
In the video it even shows a UI produced for operators to swap votes
The voter sees the printout and verifies that it matches.
but what happens when they submit it
No print out in TX
It's part of the submittal process - and the printed ballots are behind glass and not accessible.
Yes. Scan ID and signature. Electronic vote. Printout. Verify with electronic thumbprint. Print with receipt and Feds audit door to door if shit like this happens grandscale in 4,000 yrs again via pickaxe, grindstone or voting polls. Vein scan and iris in swing states.
They rejected them 3 times, because they did not meet their RFP specs. I reviewed their findings online.
True, but what if we suspected all the blue votes? How do we recount?
I cant find it now. It is either gone or I am just not querying correctly.
@Benny2Toes it's okay
In the video it shows some code
But there are municipalities that have voting software posted there as open source
Its kind of shocking actually
I would have to see what kind of system TX ended up with. They might have a printout that you don't see. Almost all new systems are requiring printed ballots for the very purpose of being able to verify the votes.
Open source is theoretically safer, because people like us can review the code and verify that there is nothing scary about it.
Had a summary page on screen, I confirmed and then submitted
No print out, machines taken to NRG facility to transfer files
In person vote
@NoobDad The printed ballots are collected by poll workers at the end of the day. I am not sure if there is any kind of a verification process, but I believe that there is a process where the paper ballots are collected from the machines at the end of the day and they are sealed and maintained with a "chain of custody" type procedure, so that they can be counted by precinct in the event of a recount.
It's the by precinct that helps to ensure that they are balancing out correctly.
... How is this not a law suit?
In Indiana, you collect the ballots, the team counts them together, republican and dem. They place them in the ballot bag and seal them, then 2 people, republican and dem drive them to headquarters and report the count.
No verification like a signature. That is a ll part of the registration for in person votes.
Ballotts are just dots