Message from @Maw

Discord ID: 779734558182211586


2020-11-21 15:40:05 UTC  

But as you can see, in Dallas, there were more inconsistencies then San Antonio

2020-11-21 15:40:30 UTC  

It led them to believe that something suspicious was going on.

2020-11-21 15:41:52 UTC  

So this is what they did. They took the entire log, and they start tabulating the votes themselves based on that. They would flag any transaction that didn't make sense. The table above displays their results.

2020-11-21 15:42:10 UTC  

These machines' source code has been reviewed numerous times.

2020-11-21 15:42:11 UTC  

Notice that the "Votes exceed ballots" is flagged 1027 times.

2020-11-21 15:42:49 UTC  

@Maw It's more complicated than that. There are multiple companies, multiple patches that can be executed.

2020-11-21 15:43:00 UTC  

It's not just one simple image that's baked into the machine

2020-11-21 15:43:35 UTC  

I mean, saying it's insecure is a lot different to saying it's intentionally set up to swap votes.

2020-11-21 15:43:48 UTC  

This is just the beginning of the video, lol

2020-11-21 15:43:57 UTC  

This is what made them suspect of the software

2020-11-21 15:44:35 UTC  

Lots of these errors can also be caused by people improperly setting up machines.

2020-11-21 15:44:44 UTC  

And a number of other issues.

2020-11-21 15:44:49 UTC  

While running their software, 1027 TIMES, not votes, times, they flagged an error where the votes exceeded their running tally of ballots

2020-11-21 15:44:56 UTC  

no, it's the log

2020-11-21 15:45:05 UTC  

... yes, I am aware.

2020-11-21 15:45:23 UTC  

Once your iterator is out of balance, it repeats this same message.

2020-11-21 15:45:29 UTC  

Every time you feed a ballot.

2020-11-21 15:46:05 UTC  

it's not a single vote, they were taking data from precincts

2020-11-21 15:46:24 UTC  

Simply having it be unequal is enough to trigger this error.

2020-11-21 15:46:32 UTC  

They also found that 96 times, someone overwrote the data with USB sticks that didn't match the previous data

2020-11-21 15:46:45 UTC  

And it could easily be that any vote on this machine that was processed after the imbalance, was saying it's imbalanced still.

2020-11-21 15:46:58 UTC  

As that tends to be how iterations are set up.

2020-11-21 15:48:11 UTC  

Here is my beef with this. I can take Floyds autopsy report and in laymans language thoroughly explain why it was not murder. In a manner most people will clearly be able to understand, and how they could check to see if my claim was correct. I am waiting for this with the voter fraud, and all I am getting is massive amounts of smoke.

2020-11-21 15:48:40 UTC  

Texas is welcome to not like any mechanism they please for any reason. We can only hope that other states thought of vetting such things. Maybe they did and found it sufficient.

2020-11-21 15:49:15 UTC  

After their analysis, Russell's firm started to research. here are prior reports that also reported on voting machine vulnerabilities.
Everest Report - https://www.cise.ufl.edu/~butler/pubs/everest.pdf
C-Span Panel: ICIT - https://www.c-span.org/video/?417203-1/discussion-focuses-cybersecurity-us-voting-systems
Matt Blaze Testimony before US House Committee https://cs.georgetown.edu/news-story/matt-blaze-testifies-on-the-capitol-hill/
ES&S Security Test Report (2017) - https://votingsystems.cdn.sos.ca.gov/vendors/ess/evs5210/ess5210-sec.pdf

2020-11-21 15:52:33 UTC  

I just wish someone knew about this and made the argument *before* the election results made it convenient. We do have people for that; people in power with a stake in it who were either powerless or asleep at the wheel.

2020-11-21 15:52:44 UTC  

@Zuluzeit They were!

2020-11-21 15:53:05 UTC  

The Everest Report is dated 12/7/2007

2020-11-21 15:53:13 UTC  

Asleep at the wheel or powerless to do anything about it?

2020-11-21 15:54:57 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/779736621850427422/unknown.png

2020-11-21 15:54:57 UTC  

@NoobDad, you just advanced to level 6!

2020-11-21 15:55:26 UTC  

Here is an example of what I'm talking about.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/779736744135491614/unknown.png

2020-11-21 15:55:57 UTC  

@NoobDad Ok, so powerless. Thanks!

2020-11-21 15:56:52 UTC  

Kinda weird how 2016 went tho, no?

2020-11-21 15:57:02 UTC  

@Maw if you watch the video, they were counting batches of votes in the logs, it wasn't a single error from one ballot, the numbers submitted exceeded the number of ballots they recorded. So if I had 20 results for 20 ballots, then on next batch I would submit 50 results but only submitted 10 new ballots

2020-11-21 15:57:46 UTC  

President, House and Senate. Seems like the glitch dropped the ball.

2020-11-21 15:57:52 UTC  

But I'm assuming the ballots were calculated separately from the ballot results, regardless, I don't have the exact details on how they conducted the log analysis

2020-11-21 15:58:17 UTC  

@Zuluzeit But he didn't, he signed the executive order in preparation for this.

2020-11-21 15:59:20 UTC  

Hahahaha yeah we didn't see that coming. Seems like It would have been a better idea to expose and fix. I do understand he was busy. Priorities.

2020-11-21 16:00:31 UTC  

He sat on his hands for 4 years after the 4 years from when he initially knew. 3d chess.