Message from @Doc
Discord ID: 779937505654734878
The executive order is always in the back of my mind when I read or watch anything regarding testimony of this election
@DrSammyD I try to look at these things from the assumption that there is a reasonable explanation - which is how the court is supposed to look at it. There are several reasons why I do this, but primarily for my mental health. In my "this is reasonable" scenario, the pristine ballots are justified as having been used to repair/replace a damaged ballot, which I believe is done when ballots jam and get damaged. This process should involve multiple people as checks and balances. Assuming Mrs Voyles took the time to look at all 98 Biden ballots and verified that they were exactly identical, this would only prove that a single batch had been compromised - whether through malfeasance to just plain laziness. In any case, her testimony alone does not prove a conspiracy, just a bad batch.
@Repeat They can say anything they want in public with no recourse if it is false - except possibly embarrassment and based on her interview performance, that is likely. They are signing a sworn affidavit that is notarized and attached to a court filing. That could carry some weight if it were proven false, but I think it might depend on how much it affected the outcome, I think. Not a lawyer - so I now risk the embarrassment.
That executive order reaches even the media though
@TaLoN132 That's only true if that precinct/county admits that curing by printing ballots is part of their process. Otherwise it goes toward proving somebody (not the polling place) has the ability and will to fabricate and place fraudulent ballots at a polling place. If that is the case, it is more likely than not that this had occurred in more than one location.
Otherwise, there's no point to building the process needed to create these ballots and place them in these polling places.
@DrSammyD, you just advanced to level 9!
I think you would have to prove intent the deceive which is hard to do. Part of the reason it is so hard to prosecute white collar crimes.
For criminal charges at least it would have to be beyond resonable doubt. Hard to prove in these types of cases.
Possible Kraken located
https://youtu.be/VAVFrFmdA2E
Me, a common person, average business owner-making a false statement would not just be embarrassing it would be monetarily devastating, let alone the thought of the possibility of the death penalty. I don’t see why average everyday non politicians would intentionally lie and risk the harmful negative impacts. I just don’t get that.
Politicians have millions of incentives to lie $$$
Of course that’s just my beliefs/opinions/thoughts
Interestingly enough, I was reading somewhere that the word Kracken may have been the project name for the software that tampered with the votes and not just a reference to Clash of the Titans. That it was an indication to people involved that she really did have evidence.
Ungh I'm so tired of Sidney Powell. She's living in fantasy land
For me, it will be hard to say until it all either comes out or nothing happens.
It’s frustrating. Can we just get honest people in politics? Lol
That’s all I want personally. It seems that I could handle any left or right as long as there is NO extreme on either part
@linuxace It is also a norwegian gigant octopus living between greenland and iceland.
@Repeat To have any chance of getting honest people in politics, you first need to be able to elect people. You have 80 holders of the CMH and 220 Nobel price winners to choose from in the US.
Political parties is a good way to block that
It’s an anti corruption software used by many Fortune 500 giants.
You’re asking for a bit too much
@JonM16, you just advanced to level 4!
Other parties have never really had a chance😞 even before the internet
@Repeat, you just advanced to level 4!
So similar to Red Owl?
In a representative democracy you elect people. Like when you guys elect sheriffs
The problem isn't that their isn't honest politicians, its figuring out which ones are honest through all of the BS.
@linuxace Here is a rule of the thumb; judge a man by his character and his character by his merits.
@Repeat As someone who also aspires to act with integrity, I'm also incredulous that others are so seemingly willing to compromise their principles for their 15 minutes or in a misguided "ends justifies the means" effort to tip the scales.
"Behold these climbing monkeys, as they climb over and under each other and sometimes tear another down into the mud below" - Nietzsche, Also Sprach Zarathustra
There is no lessor of two evils? Just evil!?
define evil?
self serving?
then vote for the self sacrificing.
Evil=illegal for me