I didn't make an excuse... I want to see his whitepaper and the sworn affidavits. I have heard too many people promise to bring "smoking guns" and "overwhelming proof" - even a Kraken - and it hasn't panned out yet. So, yeah... I'm skeptical.

Wisconsin

Michigan

The problem is that you can't prove anything in time for the electoral college. And once Biden is in office, no investigation will happen.

Sharpiegate

Maybe it will but I can tell you now how it will go.

He's raised more than $650K in putting this effort together and he seems really sincere. So, I think he seems credible.

What if evidence comes out that Doninion paid Kemp a kickback to sign them up for $100 million contract?

@NoobDad At this point, I only believe what is in the court filings, transcripts, and rulings. The press on both side distort everything.

We could what-if all day long....

Even @RobertGrulerEsq thought it was weird that he allowed the Democrats to successfully sue him into settlement.

*By press, I mean MSM/RWM/Social Media blogs, videos, podcasts, etc.

It ties together. And by Tuesday we are going to see that Kemp was in bed with Doninion

He changed the rejection law to make it easier to stuff the ballot box to make up for the manipulated numbers in the tally system. Its there

It makes sense. The evidence is getting closer to it. The big picture is there, but the evidence still has to connect the dots

Hanlon's razor would suggest otherwise.

We'll see... If they could prove that he received $100M, it would be much bigger than anything we've ever seen. Dominion Voting's DnB report says that they only had $36.5M in revenue last year. That would mean that there is a massive criminal conspriacy and laundering operation going on.

That withstanding, if this was proven, would you be willing to admit the plausibility of this conspiracy in MI, WI?

I like Occam...

I like both.

They're not mutually exclusive.

I'm a big fan of Hanlon, too.

Proof is proof... there is no need for belief. If they can prove one, they should be able to prove others.

Belief has a say in it. People are using past statistics to say that recounts rarely overturn elections

This is different.

Thousands of affidavits... no audits

All people use past experience as a predictor of likelihood. It's basically Darwinian - built into our DNA.

It's why we have precedent!

I don't think I've seen thousands of sworn affidavits.

Its propaganda. That's why people are rejecting Fox News

Nationwide

AKA: Valid court affidavits.

Or... they are rejecting Fox News because they don't want to hear what they are saying and will "Cancel" them to punish them.

Lol. Fox News called Arizona with 20% of vote. Everybody remembers that con

For valid reason, most likely.

That was the beginning of end

Which dates back to knowing that voting night would be very republican leaning.

No valid reason.. look how close it ended up being.

And it would slowly shift toward Biden.

Like we've known this for some time.

You dont call it as 20%, they rescinded