the majority of the country voted for Joe Biden,,,,,,,6 million more then voted for trump.....So that means that they wanted Biden to be president even if Biden wouldn't have been their first pick,,,,,God knows there were plenty of republican voters in 2016 who would have much rather had a different republican for President then Trump....but once he won the primary they had to go with their nominee. And many hated Hillary so bad it was more an anti Hillary vote then them being thrilled about Trump.....so you can see how it works both ways

Thanks, buddy. The Loyalist Party has been too silent lately. Time for us to rise again, I reckon. First Brexit and then back to the loving bosom of Mother England! Let's do this thing!

No... wait... I called dibs on King.

Oh snap. I contest those dibs.

Double dibs!

Dibs are dibs... they're sacred.

God is supposed to dib those dibs guys.

That's actually accurate. Dammit.

I promise you he/she did... Told me myself.

Good enough for me. You got it, I guess.

Well if God is on your side, you'll prevail over @Zuluzeit in your righteous war.

Hahahaha

Cuz He didn't say anything to me. I have no argument left.

To be honest, I'd prefer an old testament judicial oligarchy. God told them not to choose a king.

Yeah but they got a little stoning-y and stamping-y at times, no? Idk man.

Better than bombing-y

Touché

@DrSammyD do you actually understand that dominion video?

because I am trying to actually figure it out lol

does anyone?

Which one?

https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html

rummmble

just relinked

This video explains how Dominion corrupted the vote tally https://youtu.be/vOKFZeZ6y5g

Yes. So what he's saying is that your vote tabulators will override reporting from a sub set of precincts for a certain amount of time at a certain ratio, and then switch that ratio to another random set of precincts for a certain amount of time at the same ratio, in order to hide the consistent ratio being set at any given precinct.

@TaLoN132 suggested that it might be that There were some algorithms based on ??? that would trigger reporting from precincts when ever they hit a certain ratio of (rather than say # of total votes count since last reporting, which to me doesn't make any sense to put into your reporting software).

Not the reporting software... The interface software that has to decide when enough has changed in order to send it from the NEP database to the NYT system.

Which should be based on delta of votes since last report, not ratio of those votes.

Like what is the logical reasoning behind "transferring fractions"

I mean I see it as connecting dots

"I see a ratio here, and now i see a ratio here" but wtf does it _mean_

without some sort of explanation, it is literally reading tea-leaves

So if you report from a precinct at a 3:48 ratio in order to make up a deficit, you'll see that ratio in a bunch of different precincts and it will look suspicious.

I've seen programmers do some crazy things... not always the most logical, but sometimes the most expedient. I wouldn't do it that way, but you'd be surprised what people will do in a pinch.

So what you do is split that ratio among a bunch of different ratios, run those ratios on different precincts for X amount of votes, then switch to a different precinct with those ratios, and eventually you've switched enough votes in different precincts.

Yes, but if you are trying to cheat, presumably there is a method to the madness

That's one possibility. The thing is, those numbers are coming from so many different data paths that it is not likely.

Minimum # of votes or Time since last report is the simplest mechanism. Why you would ever do a ratio makes no sense. It would be harder to implement.

And you'd report more often.

It wouldn't perform it's function.