Nothing new. Just the same talking points..

Do you think anything will come of it in the long run?

Less talking more statual rendition

Those same “talking points” of equal protection are very valid and have been ruled on in many cases by the Supreme Court

@thebrodys, you just advanced to level 1!

Chief Supreme Justice Roberts has made his stance on equal protections very clear.

Chief Justice*

The remedy to equal protection is to franchises voters not to de franchise voters

Yes but if there is proven fraud then that would disenfranchise voters would it not?

There is no proven fraud

The equal protection thing was about curing ballots

fraud is the wrong word for it

That was thrown out of court

the point is to find systematic tampering ^^

so it can be inflated into fraud ^^

Or allude to it when you lack any real proof

I’m going to shut up until I’ve actually read the lawsuit 🙈

So far all we have are accusations

Don't pull your hairs out on court papers they just describe a broken fishglass with every crack and repair

Which court papers are you talking about

The one filed today in Michigan

The dominion argument is summarized as this , atm machines can be hacked so people in your neighborhood are stealing from the atm. All atms across America are being stolen from

Well that’s not good is it 🙈😂

Nope

It's not a good argument... It's good in that it really isn't happening.

I meant to reply to @Beth on that one.

Given in court that would mean there'd had to be a whistle to be blown like one from the inside, to investigate the machine procedure ^^

Not really

Many witnesses especially eyewitness are torn apart in court with a good cross examination

given one of these machines unaltered were on exhibit it'd were explained like in one of those videos after it's a witness claiming they were told to alter them with say hidden camera recording ^^

if there was a request for 20 minutes there had to be some small thing to be expanded into a court nightmare

They were heard by the court already?

right now it's hearings and waiting for response

I thought they were trying to push all this back to dec or January

they as in the state court yes

Give them time to concoct some ridiculous argument meant to further stall

Even r and r is saying that this isn’t about any real evidence

It’s just to find some long shot way to kick it to congress

or to go into a court case filled with ways to not be denied till they're forced to investigate and be driven to discoviering collusion ^^

That’s just the pretense

I have been pouring over the GA filing as I get time... I'm still not through the whole thing yet. I still haven't found the proof that Powell promised. It seems that she is taking a multipronged "throw everything against the wall" approach. The first part is a multi-tiered circumstantial case. She seems to use a circumstantial relationship between Smartmatic and Dominion (which many have debunked pretty thoroughly) - even if the Sequoia transactions were part of some plot to share dubious code across all platforms, there is no direct proof that it happened. Also, previously identified potential vulnerabilities were concerning, but were found on systems that did not have paper ballots, which is why they were required so it would be possible to prove vote switching did or did not occur. This circumstantial link between companies and the previous concerns raised about a system that lacked checks/balances (even though they now exist) are an attempt to assert that vote switching is possible so that the scenarios attested to by the witnesses can be viewed in a negative light that possibly might mean that someone exploited to previous possibly exploit that may or may not still be there.