Message from @Beth
Discord ID: 781582756857249792
I will
Thanks
protection of innocence ^^
Let me read this while i peel the potatoes
Nothing new. Just the same talking points..
Do you think anything will come of it in the long run?
Less talking more statual rendition
Those same βtalking pointsβ of equal protection are very valid and have been ruled on in many cases by the Supreme Court
@thebrodys, you just advanced to level 1!
Chief Supreme Justice Roberts has made his stance on equal protections very clear.
Chief Justice*
The remedy to equal protection is to franchises voters not to de franchise voters
Yes but if there is proven fraud then that would disenfranchise voters would it not?
There is no proven fraud
The equal protection thing was about curing ballots
fraud is the wrong word for it
That was thrown out of court
the point is to find systematic tampering ^^
so it can be inflated into fraud ^^
Or allude to it when you lack any real proof
So far all we have are accusations
Don't pull your hairs out on court papers they just describe a broken fishglass with every crack and repair
Which court papers are you talking about
The one filed today in Michigan
The dominion argument is summarized as this , atm machines can be hacked so people in your neighborhood are stealing from the atm. All atms across America are being stolen from
Well thatβs not good is it ππ
Nope
It's not a good argument... It's good in that it really isn't happening.
Given in court that would mean there'd had to be a whistle to be blown like one from the inside, to investigate the machine procedure ^^
Not really
Many witnesses especially eyewitness are torn apart in court with a good cross examination
given one of these machines unaltered were on exhibit it'd were explained like in one of those videos after it's a witness claiming they were told to alter them with say hidden camera recording ^^
if there was a request for 20 minutes there had to be some small thing to be expanded into a court nightmare
They were heard by the court already?
right now it's hearings and waiting for response
I thought they were trying to push all this back to dec or January
they as in the state court yes
Give them time to concoct some ridiculous argument meant to further stall
Even r and r is saying that this isnβt about any real evidence