But yea I can rant about papers, peer review and science credibility for an hour

Maybe he'll get the coofs too *plug in the TYT reaction of Trumo got the coofs*

I should have listened further... He thinks what Sidney Powell has asserted is true. It is demonstrably not true, in my opinion. So, his premise is not sound.

Page 59, section 122 in the GA filing starts talking about statistical evidence. If all that proves to be true..isn’t that enough?

@thebrodys, you just advanced to level 3!

I hope so

He doesn't say that it is provable though

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3WPBupdKfw context ^^

He assumes that you can prove things with statistics but not pin it on something like Dominion

In the beginning he does talk about Sydney Powell and how she has fallen into a trap in some of the things she’s said

Did you start from 26:00?

no

Yeah...

All this statistics. Is done as a hypothesis.. to show ways of how could fraud be committed.. but Zero evidence

Wrong reply... Yes to starting at 26:00

Ack. Like I said he doesn't rely on Powell

That’s not necessarily true. It can be proven that it happened, but it will take a long time to prove WHO did it. Dr. Corsi, does talk about that

> It got peer reviewed ... There were corrections suggested and accepted
@realz That's a lot like when Switzerland didn't ban homeopathy outright and homeopathic practitioners claimed that as acknowledgement of validity. I don't want to belabor the point because the chat has moved on but it's still funny to me.

First Page and main point. Is Venezuela dominion and Hugo Chavez.. is going to nowhere land

But don’t you start where it began?

His argument is tdlr @TaLoN132

A. Assuming there is _statistical evidence of fraud_ (not specific to Dominion or any specific method).

B. Even if we can't figure out who or why that happened, the method, and can't convict anyone of doing it.

C. We can use statistical evidence because Roberts has in the past accepted statistical evidence for the Voting Rights Act w.r.t "state action" to disenfranchise, even without an underlying explaination of the statistics.

Hugo Chavez isn't dead. He exists now in his true reptilian form. This isn't rocket science.

Agreed... All of these states have paper ballots. If there was a question of vote switching, they could simply recount. That didn't pan out in GA, so it is off the table. They now have to try to play the statistics game, because the paper ballots match what was counted.

Yes . But who in their right mind will believe that Hugo Chavez planned to overthrown Trump

But I don’t think that’s the point they are making...

The difference is that Roberts used statistical evidence of past elections to justify making changes for future elections. That's different than using it to justify reversing the current one.

@thebrodys aha so he is saying the remedy should be that the court sends it to congress to choose the president. Robert (R&R) has addressed such remedies before and has explained that courts are _extremely_ reluctant to take remedies that are larger than the damage, though it isn't impossible

If there are fraudulent ballots that are considered verified then yes a recount just counts them again and says yep all checks out

Well... dead people vote, don't they?

When ur named Team Strike Force.. and says the Kraken will be released. . Doesn't give u alot of credibility

They voted in a dead man you tell me

2 dead men come to think of it 3 if you include vices

Well when you word it like that... 😂

Unpopular opinion of the day: dead people should have the right to vote.

@TaLoN132 like that lady that Tucker and the president mentioned.. who was alive

same as minors

they're as valid to vote than the dead

Tucker came back sorry . My apologies. We made a mistake

Just start when they are in the womb

Yea that might be another problem (if true)

a reason to keep that yiffer rather than to wire em that'd be a nice way to prevent these 9th month atrocities