at least she espouses a non-activist approach

Espouses

the opposition _espouses_ activism!

I'll remind you prior to ACB the Dems tried to block a very experienced judge on 30 year old allegations

Not so Fun fact... The Senate started holding hearing because FDR accidentally nominated a (former) member of the KKK.

So I'm not convinced Dems had any principle to their opposition to nominations

"accidentally" ?

😛

the KKK ruins everything

Not so fun fact, FDR had concentration camps. I'm not surprised

Oh sorry, "internment camps"

yea they weren't concentration camps

Nobody's perfect... I heard Marilyn Monroe farted in bed.

that is being unfair

I remember in the hearing she answered a question with “do you think a woman can’t think for herself” in response to who her donors were. It’s very likely with that tiny amount of experience she may very well be just that, How do you develop any real personal experience or “experience based judgment” with only ruling over 100 cases

Barnes doesn't like her either

he thinks she will turn into a leftist

How

And why

based on some of her judgements he has read

go watch Frei if you want to minutia

Ugh frei

many republican nominees have become the left side of the court

R and R is better

I was bothered that she kept replying that they should take her at her word because of her integrity - as it that was a given.

yea but R&R doesn't know/discuss constitutional law politics as well as Barnes

R said he listens to Barnes ...

Right @TaLoN132

@realz Barnes is too partisan for me

partisan or not, he knows whats going on in the constitutional political circles

How often do constitution and criminal defense intersect

uncivil law and rekita seem okay

really lol

rekieta is too partisan for _me_!

I listen to him when nothing else is on 😛

He is like a memer mostly

I don’t know any other lawyers on YouTube

I found an a video of her talking at a conference in 2016. She was complaining to the audience that Obama shouldn't be allowed to replace Scalia not just because he was a conservative, but because it was *his* seat Antonin Scalia, conservative icon.

Strange

I wonder how she would support that with some formal argument

Check this out - from about 10:00 minutes in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yjTEdZ81lI