Message from @busillis

Discord ID: 781941746010554378


2020-11-27 17:50:25 UTC  
2020-11-27 17:50:41 UTC  

@busillis .. yes we will be doing alot of burning and digging

2020-11-27 17:51:27 UTC  

Allegations aren't proof. There were allegations of Russian interference and voter suppression 4 years ago - Republicans had no interest in investigating then. (for the record, I don't think there was collusion, but there definitely was interference). The point is that anyone can raise allegations. To date, I have seen evidence of a handful of provable fraud and zero evidence of massive fraud of a scale that would have turned the election.

2020-11-27 17:52:09 UTC  

Lockdowns will not solve the problem. Lockdowns only prolong the problem and make things worse for the population intermittently.

2020-11-27 17:52:14 UTC  

@MatiLuc what about the unattributed death due to the economic impact?

2020-11-27 17:52:28 UTC  

Lockdowns are to prevent hospitals from being overburdened.

2020-11-27 17:52:53 UTC  

If hospitals are not being overburdened, why do we want to lock down?

2020-11-27 17:52:59 UTC  

@Maw that's assuming the whole thing is not an aberration.

2020-11-27 17:53:20 UTC  

Like the yellow cake

2020-11-27 17:54:06 UTC  

We got way off point. Trump cannot put the burden on Biden to prove fraud, that’s trumps job

2020-11-27 17:54:23 UTC  
2020-11-27 17:54:47 UTC  
2020-11-27 17:54:56 UTC  

There have to be some sort of balance in the whole control... and protocols without having to shut down. But we dont follow anything .. unless its personal. If is not my problem not my business. Mentality

2020-11-27 17:54:57 UTC  

Has he published his whitepaper?

2020-11-27 17:55:04 UTC  

Doubt

2020-11-27 17:55:09 UTC  

He said Monday iirc

2020-11-27 17:55:27 UTC  

Matt Brynard makes excellent points

2020-11-27 17:55:47 UTC  

It's state-controlled, arguably as it should be.

2020-11-27 17:56:01 UTC  

The methodology he outlined in his latest video had many issues.

2020-11-27 17:56:58 UTC  

There were many issues with what he put together from a data integrity standpoint.

2020-11-27 17:57:20 UTC  

It seems like no matter what one's political persuasion common ground could be found in securing elections.

2020-11-27 17:57:22 UTC  

@Maw doenst make sense. If Nyc is fully infected and Miami is not . 10000. From nyc travel and infect all Florida. Who is controlling this

2020-11-27 17:57:39 UTC  

List issues

2020-11-27 17:57:54 UTC  

These states can control their own interstate travel.

2020-11-27 17:57:57 UTC  

What's the argument?

2020-11-27 17:58:02 UTC  

Copy paste ur youtube comments and tag me

2020-11-27 17:58:19 UTC  
2020-11-27 17:58:59 UTC  

NY literally prevented other states from entering. They put up mandatory quarantines for out of state travellers.

2020-11-27 17:59:24 UTC  

@Maw no states is controlling anything. Travel. Or tracking..so until the vaccines arrive we r .with this issue

2020-11-27 17:59:27 UTC  

@realz Matt seems very sincere and obviously put a lot of effort into this, but I have some serious reservations about the methodology and the conclusions.

1) Most scientific analyses will have a control group to test their methodology. Limited time and resources complicated matters, but he could have also chosen a state that went for Trump to see if these types of anomalies are common.
2) Since Trump actively encouraged his supporters at rallies during the campaign to try to game the system to prove that it wasn't as secure as advertised and since it is impossible to tell whether these anomalies benefitted one side or the other, it is just as possible that this helped Trump as Biden. Of course, that may have been Trump's goal.
3) WRT Unreturned ballots, Matt fails to mention that the USPS very publicly instituted measures to impede the delivery of mail. The fact that returned ballots didn't make it in time is just as likely to have been a result of engineered mail delays.
4) Claims by voters that they did not request a ballot, should be used to investigate further, but are not proof of fraud having taken place until verified. Matt indicates that many of those who claimed that they did not request a ballot would refuse to sign an affidavit attesting to that fact. When that happens, was the denial included in the totals? If so, I would argue that they should not be. At the very least, there should be a breakdown of denials and denials with sworn affidavits. Only those that have affidavits would be likely to be verified.
5) The CoVid antibody analogy may not be totally applicable. With CoVid, if you have the antibody, you had been or are infected. Matt rightly says that people denying having requested a ballot needs to be investigated further. If proven, though, the existence of multiple isolated instances of fraud is not proof of widespread fraud.

2020-11-27 17:59:38 UTC  

@MatiLuc That is false.

2020-11-27 17:59:49 UTC  

States are controlling this, and it's their responsibility.

2020-11-27 17:59:52 UTC  

@realz 6) In-state NCOA, did they check for multiple property records for the voter? Many people who have multiple properties will vote from their original address. Also, students who are away at school will keep their home address. Again those that denied should be verified via audit of ballot request.
7) WRT OOS, Matt never explains Merged Military, which seems to be roughly equal to the sum of both OOS. Military are allowed to vote absentee in their home state. GA has a very high enlistment rate. Were these factored in or excluded from the totals?
8) Double voting is bad. All should be prosecuted. But, again, no way to know who benefited.
9) Matt's description of IC voters in WI is misleading. It is up to the voter to make that assertion, the only caveat is that they can't do it to avoid showing ID. If a voter has a valid ID and is willing to show it, but has chosen to isolate due to being high risk, this is a valid reason. To indicate fraud, they would have to identify IC voters that do not have an ID.
10) Matt's declaration of not being able to trust this Dem win while trusting the last 4 seems disingenuous or maybe misguided. As it stands now, the result of these efforts is a list of possible investigations that may or not have been a case of fraud. Even if they all investigations proved fraud, he did not conduct the same analysis on those previous elections. The only reason that anyone doubted the result of this election was Donald Trump said it would be "rigged" every single day for the last 7 months or so. A claim, by the way, that Trump has made in every election and primary he has ever participated in (win or lose) going all the way back to the 2003 Emmys. True story.

2020-11-27 18:00:06 UTC  

@Maw is not i live in nYc . Is total mess here

2020-11-27 18:00:07 UTC  

@realz I admire Matt's efforts, but this is no smoking gun and I think it was somewhat irresponsible of him to cast aspersions on the results of this election based on this admittedly incomplete analysis. That's not to say fraud didn't happen - it's just this is not proof of widespread fraud. And without that proof, this result should be treated no different than any other election.

2020-11-27 18:00:31 UTC  

Governor Cuomo is trying

2020-11-27 18:00:35 UTC  

Covid-19 isn’t fun, we’ve had it. But guess what...after a few days it went away...and during those days I had it, I worked 6-8 hours a day on my personal house remodel. It does affect certain age groups more and those at risk folks should take preventive measures but for the vast majority of people, it’s hardly worse than the flu

2020-11-27 18:01:18 UTC  

States are in control of this.

2020-11-27 18:01:22 UTC  

It's their responsibility.

2020-11-27 18:02:48 UTC  

@Maw like i said. I live this everyday. . People come to this country. No test required. By usa. 14 days quarenteen no one respect. Impossible to track